| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
016823
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Feb 19, 1994.
|
| Description |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
138497
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The election of new governments in Pakistan and India in 2013 and 2014, respectively, has sparked controversies about the likely trajectory of the enduring rivalry. Emerging individual and domestic conditions reportedly created new opportunities for incremental rapprochement. Equipped with strong political mandates and backed by powerful constituencies, Pakistan's Nawaz Sharif and India's Narendra Modi initially set out to stabilize and revive their countries’ fragile economies and declared improved bilateral ties as a key precondition for implementing their economic agendas. However, mutual recriminations and border tensions resurfaced soon to prevent the revival of the stalled diplomatic dialogue in late 2014. Drawing on a thorough review of research on rivalry maintenance and termination and, in particular, the assumptions of the punctuated equilibrium model developed by Paul Diehl and Gary Goertz, this paper demonstrates how the conflict's structural complexities are likely to persist and undermine the chances for conflict resolution in the years ahead. The prevalent role of the army and a vibrant anti-Indian Islamic ideology in Pakistan, the persistence of a conflict lobby in India, lingering territorial feuds and ever increasing power asymmetries between the two countries, and decreasing third-party mediation in the Indo-Pakistani conflict will likely suffocate any initiative, however well-intended or pragmatic it may be. Even if bold leadership manages to revive a comprehensive peace process, it would have to be based on systematic confidence building measures in order to make it resilient to crises.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
131071
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
155033
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Alpha Editions, 2017.
|
| Description |
vii, 304p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789386367792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059188 | 327.54/PRA 059188 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
140472
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
052357
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
052318
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
051973
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
051721
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
053902
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
166424
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2016.
|
| Description |
xvi, 522p.: tables, figurehbk
|
| Standard Number |
9780199458325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059675 | 327.54/GAN 059675 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
157965
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oxon, Routledge, 2017.
|
| Description |
vi, 387p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9781138290785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059334 | 320.954/EUR 059334 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
184176
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Kautilya Books, 2022.
|
| Description |
183p.: photograph, figures, mapspbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789390885725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 060163 | 809.916/ANW 060163 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
185818
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
167703
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Noida, Turning Point Publishers, 2019.
|
| Description |
xv, 291p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9788193783153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059710 | 327.54/KHA 059710 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
169814
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India’s relations with Pakistan are characterized by mutual bickering, sinister wrangling, verbal dual, and simmering hostility which have been going on since the day of their Independence. Pakistan’s sponsorship of militancy and terrorism has made relations as bad as in the immediate aftermath of independence. So, India’s policy towards Pakistan has oscillated like a pendulum and Pakistan has now become India’s the most difficult neighbor and cannot be dealt with like India’s other South Asian neighbours because of number of factors like its strategic significance for outside powers like China and the USA, its military, nuclear and missile capabilities and its territorial dispute over Kashmir after bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union territories. In this context, G Paarthasarathy, former Indian High Commissioner has observed that India-Pakistan reconciliation is like trying to treat two patients whose only disease is an allergy to each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
093328
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The histroy of South Asian politics since the end of the second World War has been a kaleidoscope of at least threee major wars between India and Pakistan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
100386
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
146727
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India’s foreign policy discussion remains incongruous without the mention of India and Pakistan relation. Since independence, both India and Pakistan has been in logger heads with each other and the origin of their conflict is regarding the Kashmir issue. Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee during his tenure had tried through diplomatic ways and bilateral dialogue to resolve the various issues which hinder their bilateral ties. However, his repeated efforts could not fulfill his aim of developing friendly relations with its immediate neighbours. At present our present Prime Minister Narendra Modi is also trying to carry forward the legacy of Vajpayee with regard to India’s relation with Pakistan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
054692
|
|
|