| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
101307
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
116491
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article challenges the accepted view that during the period of martial law Taiwan's labour unions were "a useless token." Focusing on the petroleum and sugar industries, I analyse the incremental process of how party-state control over the labour unions was converted by the workers themselves in Taiwan's national enterprises. In the early 1950s, the KMT's policy of unionizing enterprises was a complementary strategy to reinforce its slow and unsuccessful party-state penetration. With the unions' prominent role in welfare provision, workers were encouraged to develop a sense of stakeholdership. Over the years, labour unions legitimatized the interests of worker members and thus gave rise to an explosion of claim-making activities - what I call "petty bargaining." By the mid-1980s, labour unions, although still dominated by the KMT, were no longer a Leninist transmission belt, but rather functioned as a de facto complaint centre - an often overlooked precondition for the rise of post-1987 independent labour unionism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
111303
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
045198
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, C Hurst and company, 1975.
|
| Description |
xii, 283p.: tableshbk
|
| Standard Number |
0903983435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 017011 | 951.05/DOM 017011 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
023938
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Hong Kong, Union Research Institute, 1968.
|
| Description |
xvi, 405p.Hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 002187 | 923.20951/UNI 002187 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
030224
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Carleton, Carleton UNiversity, 1980.
|
| Description |
25p
|
| Series |
Occasional Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 004273 | 947.0853/BRO 004273 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
083046
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Signet Books, 1967.
|
| Description |
349p.Pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 053719 | 923.1597/FAL 053719 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
032099
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Moscow, Progres publishers, 1973.
|
| Description |
203p.hbk
|
| Series |
Socialism Today
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 012909 | 947.0853/TUZ 012909 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
128928
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
088688
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
151414
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Xi Jinping era version of a China model of development continues law’s reform-era roles of generally market-oriented development (under newly challenging conditions), checking development-challenging threats (amid increased concerns over corruption) and reducing pressure for political change (at a time of intolerance toward dissent). The Xi-era version of law appears to be more ‘legalist’ (than its predecessor), still ‘reformist-developmentalist’ and more ‘Leninist’. The Xi-era project for law remains narrowly instrumentalist, uneven across subject matter and region, and beset by both ‘supply-side’ and ‘demand-side’ challenges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
040505
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Allen Lane the Penguin press, 1972.
|
| Description |
191p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
0713902590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 010328 | 923.1/FIS 010328 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
038742
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1967.
|
| Description |
xvii, 326p.Hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 000242 | 923.251/MEI 000242 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
023764
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Hutchinson and Co.(Publishers) Ltd, 1979.
|
| Description |
480p.: ill.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
009134610X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 018609 | 923.151/WIL 018609 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
184541
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
116201
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
152031
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Since becoming head of the Communist Party in China in late 2012, Xi Jinping has accrued an impressive raft of titles. He has been compared to the founder of the regime, Mao Zedong, and is seen by some as sitting at the centre of a network of different power sources. But is power as personalised as this model makes out in contemporary China, with all its complexity and diversity? And can one person really rule the continental sized country in this paternalistic way? This article argues that Xi's powers are intrinsically linked with the organisation that he leads and which his power is sourced in – the Party itself. Far from him being the emperor of modern China, it is the Communist Party which acts as the all-seeing, all-powerful ruler. In this model, Xi is its servant, not its master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
029625
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Secker and Warburg, 1974.
|
| Description |
x, 443p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
436509903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 014918 | 947/SZA 014918 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
093633
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Russia and China mark the 60th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between them, which have traversed a tortuous path during these decades - from allied closeness based on ideological identity and bloc solidarity, then hostility and even brinkmanship on the verge of military action to strategic partnership and interaction within the framework of the relations of a new type.
Our present relations - the best in their entire history - are based on common interests, common concerns and mutual support on principal problems. But they do not envisage the formation of a military-political alliance, are not aimed against third countries and represent a viable structure. Its formation was of a stage-by-stage character. In 1992 the two sides confirmed the need to regard themselves as friendly countries. In 1994 it was decided to establish the relations of constructive partnership, and in 1996 - equal trust-based relations of partnership aimed at strategic interaction in the 21st century. In 2001 the basic political Treaty was signed - On Good-Neighborliness, Friendship and Cooperation, which sealed the relations of strategic partnership and interaction.
Such character of relations between the two biggest neighboring countries seems quite natural today, but at that time it was actually a notable event in politics which became a subject of close attention and analysis by many authoritative researchers. I'd like to express some of my own views emphasizing the sixty-year experience and lessons of our relations with the PRC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
027783
|
|
|
|
|
| Edition |
1st ed.
|
| Publication |
Agra, Sri Ram Mehra and company., 1969.
|
| Description |
xii, 452p.Hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 003720 | 947/AGA 003720 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|