| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
130240
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Let me begin by putting my own moral and ideological cards on the table, since I assume that I have been asked to participate in this symposium because of, and not in spite of, the fact that I reject the idea that America's global hegemony is not just good for the United States but assures global peace and stability as well, and thus is good for the world. In his recent book-length article for a special issue of the New Left Review titled "American Foreign Policy and Its Thinkers," a brilliant, implacable anatomization of the American Empire, Perry Anderson approvingly quotes Christopher Layne's observation that "in international relations, benevolent hegemons are like unicorns-there is no such animal." That is certainly my view. And I would add that a democratic empire (for other than its own citizens, at least) is quite simply a contradiction in terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
091451
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Should Americans be worried that the international system is growing decidedly more plural and less hegemonic? Can a more plural world system be avoided, given the awakening of China, the integration of Europe, and the revival of Russia? And what would be the cost of trying to avoid it? US military spending already is roughly equal to that of the rest of the world combined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
139000
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
IS RETREAT from global hegemony in America’s national interest? No idea has percolated more widely over the past decade—and none is more bogus. The United States is not headed for the skids and there is no reason it should be. The truth is that America can and should seek to remain the world’s top dog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
152148
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The “One China Principle” proclaims that both Taiwan and mainland China are inalienable parts of a single “China”, whereof both governments claim to be the true and legitimate representatives. As both governments are striving for unification of both the territories, both uphold the One China policy, which asks that countries seeking diplomatic relations with the mainland People’s Republic of China must break off diplomatic relations with the Republic of China in Taiwan and vice versa. With the US President Donald Trump first questioning this principle and then retracting from his stated position vis-à-vis Beijing’s blunt and aggressive reaction, the consequent scenario may further push ahead the already declining American power and hegemony in the world and may also aggravate the ongoing Sino-US competitive race towards global hegemony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
159946
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
China and the United States of America are the two big powers of the world, shaping the new dimensions of global stability and security under the leadership of dynamic Xi Jinping and the daring Trump. China has the aspirations to catch up Chinese Dream on the other hand Trump is willing to restore American dream and make America great again. It will create controversy and conflict among each other particularly on security and economic issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
089406
|
|
|