Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
090364
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
World War I historiography focuses on the introduction of chemical weapons to European battlefields, mainly the Western Front, but ignores their use during the Palestine Campaign. In 1917 the (British) Egyptian Expeditionary Force fired chemical-filled artillery shells against Ottoman forces. During the Second Battle of Gaza (April 1917), the chemical bombardment was unsuccessful in supporting the infantry assault. In the Third Battle of Gaza (October-November 1917), it was much more effective in its diversionary role of drawing Ottoman attention away from the main thrust toward Beersheba. This article examines the chemical operations and the Ottoman response, analyses the outcome, and suggests explanations for the historiographical disregard of these events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
090365
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Traditional narratives of World War I generally overlook a misunderstood but important part of the conflict: information warfare. Both Great Britain and Germany understood the significance of information as a force multiplier and as a valuable financial and diplomatic tool in the larger geostrategic environment. Britain's systematic wartime destruction of Germany's prewar network occurred on a much larger level than historians have recognized. Germany's simultaneous but hidden campaign against Allied communications has escaped historical notice. Greater understanding of this missing element, both in World War I and beyond, will deepen our understanding of the larger economic, political, intelligence, and military dimensions of modern conflict.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
122496
|
|
|
Publication |
Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2012.
|
Description |
viii, 651p.Hbk
|
Standard Number |
9780674061491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
057384 | 940.31/LAM 057384 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|