| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
119845
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
090383
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The motivation for unleading the GWOT was obviously 9/11. The military campaign to demolish the Al Qaeda and its Taliban sponsors in Afghanistan, thereafter, was perhaps justified. Widening the swathe of the military onslaught to Iraq, however, was clearly a mistake, especially now that it is abundantly clear that the conflict there had more to do with settling scores with an old foe than with any terror links with 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
115948
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The phenomenon of nuclear terrorism has been the subject of intense debate as also much hype. This article seeks to cut through the hype and examine the real portents of the threat in terms of event possibilities. In doing so, it calls for sobriety and balance in discussion, emphasizes the need to guard against ignoring numerous scientific facts and real difficulties along the way, and cautions against embracing unduly alarmist overtones. It further emphasizes the need to be resolute with regard to incident occurrence because the potential consequences of a nuclear terrorist attack are so devastating as to outweigh the very low probability of event occurrence.
If current approaches towards eliminating the threat of nuclear terrorism are not replaced with a sense of urgency and resolve, the question will become not if, but when, and on what scale the first act of nuclear terrorism occurs.
-Extracted from the US-Russia Joint Threat Assessment on Nuclear Terrorism, May 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|