| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
192658
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Whilst NATO speaks increasingly publicly about the military use of cyber operations, adaptation to the cyber domain has reportedly been challenging for most militaries. Little research has sought to understand the nature of these challenges. This study seeks to address this gap through a case study of the Netherlands. By utilizing a range of primary and secondary sources, this article reveals that the Dutch Defense Cyber Command has faced significant constraints in its adaptation to the cyber domain, primarily due to issues related to organizational structure, operational mandate, and the availability of skills and resources. A cyber command that lacks regular opportunities for day-to-day operations and where personnel may not have continuous learning opportunities to acquire and refine their skills will encounter difficulties in recruiting, training, and retaining a proficient workforce. These findings highlight the tendency of observers to mistakenly equate the mere establishment of a cyber command with the existence of a robust military cyber capability – namely, the ability to effectively carry out and sustain a range of cyber operations for tactical or strategic purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
090450
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In the light of the foregoing, it can be said that while a number of recommendations of the KRC report and GoM's report have been implemented, some of the key recommendations which would have improved joint ness and integration amongst the armed forces remain to be implemented in a meaningful manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
190551
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
his paper presents the authors' views on the effectiveness of force development in the Russian Federation in terms of the combat potential of troop (force) groupings in strategic sectors. It proposes and substantiates an improved methodological approach to the comprehensive assessment of their capability in the interests of raising the standards of Armed Forces development and force development overall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
091125
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Afghanistan is an increasingly complex environment set to test our traditional approaches to planning and problem solving. With an evolving commitment, an ambitious force development plan up to 2030 and ompeting demands, there is a need for planners from all services to consider more innovative and adaptive approaches to mission planning. This article offers a few thoughts based on the author's experience in Afghanistan to aid in stimulating new approaches to both this and future operational thinking and planning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|