Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:350
Hits:19939414
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
DAWSON, GRANT
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
090770
Contact Africa: Canadian foreign policy, the contact group, and Southern Africa
/ Dawson, Grant
Dawson, Grant
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2009.
Summary/Abstract
Participation in the contact group serviced Canada's foreign policy interests in Africa. Ministers and bureaucrats believed that Canada's developing relations with black Africa were becoming more important than the traditional link to South Africa. The government hoped to maintain Canada's positive reputation among Africans by working on problems of cocern to positive reputation among Africans by working on problems of concern to them, such as South Africa's control of Namibia and apartheid.
Key Words
Southern Africa
;
Canada
;
SWAPO
;
Namibia - Liberal Movement
;
Foreign Policy
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
186294
No future for Libya with Gaddafi: Classical realism, status and revenge in the UK intervention in Libya
/ Dawson, Grant
Dawson, Grant
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
Why did Britain intervene in Libya in 2011? Several explanations suggest themselves: security, R2P and status. The article shows that status was a significant motivating factor, and this demonstrates a dynamic that helps to refine a classical realist theory of intervention. The article calls for status to be seen intrinsically and instrumentally, and for more attention to be paid to the related motive of revenge. The findings suggest (though do not prove from a causal standpoint) that status may be a stronger motive than security for state decision-makers. The article’s central empirical argument is that regime change in Libya was not the last stage of Britain’s foreign policy of intervention. Rather, intervention was the last stage in Britain’s status and revenge-driven foreign policy of regime change. Britain saw the Libya crisis as a chance to preserve its great power status and revenge Muammar Gaddafi for past wrongs.
Key Words
Libya with Gaddaf
;
UK intervention in Libya
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export