|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
192957
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
I examine how mutual perception and role expectation evolve over time between China and Russia on each other's position in the international system and on bilateral relations in the context of shifting perceptions of the "Big Triangle" between the United States, Russia, and China since the late 1990s. Building on Role Theory in international relations, I use official texts, and experts' opinions during a series of key policy episodes to demonstrate that constantly adjusting role expectations and role enactment has become an important part of official Sino-Russian inter-state relations. Such relations have evolved from a more conservative, mutual role expectation of "do-no-harm" to more proactive expectations of joint efforts and policy coordination. This changing role expectation comes along with mutual reassurance against role mismanagement when both seek to substantiate the role of "significant others" beyond traditional military allies. During the 2010s, Sino-Russian bilateral relations started to be increasingly shaped by a discussion about the salience of US-China-Russia "Big Triangle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
154688
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2017.
|
Description |
lxiii, 303p.: tables, figureshbk
|
Standard Number |
9788182749276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059157 | 327.51/KON 059157 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
145629
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2016.
|
Description |
xviii, 427p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9788182749078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
058700 | 327.51/PAN 058700 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
058701 | 327.51/PAN 058701 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
095561
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In contrast to Sino-Russian relations at the state-level, regional cooperation between the contiguous Russian Far East and Chinese North East has been difficult to achieve, despite the existence of seemingly natural economic complementarities. This article asks why this is the case and argues that one important stumbling block, i.e. negative reactions to Chinese labour migration, has become less problematic. Situating Russian Far East/Chinese North East relations in a regionalist framework the article compares the salience and framing of major issues in regional relations in Chinese and Russian media at the national and regional levels. Contrary to earlier research, the findings suggest that economic and regional development issues, and not Chinese migration into the Russian Far East, are by far the most salient sets of issues on both sides. However, significant differences in the framing of these issues suggest that a convergence of opinion on the desirability of regional cooperation masks contradictory expectations for the direction of regional development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
092025
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Since the start of the twenty-century, change in the trilateral relations between China, Russia and India have attracted from the international community. Bilateral relations between China-Russia, China-India and Russia-India witnessed continuous development, and their mutually beneficial cooperation saw strengthening and expansion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
130469
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
So far, the year 2014 has been a tumultuous one, as geopolitical rivalries have stormed back to center stage. Whether it is Russian forces seizing Crimea, China making aggressive claims in its coastal waters, Japan responding with an increasingly assertive strategy of its own, or Iran trying to use its alliances with Syria and Hezbollah to dominate the Middle East, old-fashioned power plays are back in international relations. The United States and the EU, at least, find such trends disturbing. Both would rather move past geopolitical questions of territory and military power and focus instead on ones of world order and global governance: trade liberalization, nuclear nonproliferation, human rights, the rule of law, climate change, and so on. Indeed, since the end of the Cold War, the most important objective of U.S. and EU foreign policy has been to shift international relations away from zero-sum issues toward win-win ones. To be dragged back into old-school contests such as that in Ukraine doesn't just divert time and energy away from those important questions; it also changes the character of international politics. As the atmosphere turns dark, the task of promoting and maintaining world order grows more daunting. But Westerners should never have expected old-fashioned geopolitics to go away. They did so only because they fundamentally misread what the collapse of the Soviet Union meant: the ideological triumph of liberal capitalist democracy over communism, not the obsolescence of hard power. China, Iran, and Russia never bought into the geopolitical settlement that followed the Cold War, and they are making increasingly forceful attempts to overturn it. That process will not be peaceful, and whether or not the revisionists succeed, their efforts have already shaken the balance of power and changed the dynamics of international politics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
177509
|
|
|
Publication |
Zurich, Center for Security Studies, 2021.
|
Description |
122p.pbk
|
Standard Number |
9783905696769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059994 | 341.2333/CAR 059994 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
183917
|
|
|
Publication |
Switzerland, Center for Security Studies, 2022.
|
Description |
115p.pbk
|
Series |
Center for Security Studies
|
Standard Number |
9783905696851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
060160 | 341.2333/CAR 060160 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|