| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
127111
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
122503
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The incidents in the Depsang Plain, near the Karakoram Pass in April or more recently, in Chumar in South Ladakh, are the continuance of Nehru's blind spot for China. There is today a huge difference of 'perception' on the location of the Line of Actual Control which over the years has been moving towards the South and the West. The 1959 LAC was indeed far more advantageous for India than the present LAC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
118112
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
122153
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
118936
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
137766
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
175072
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India and China have entered a new low in their bilateral relations. Having fought a war in 1962, it took over three decades for both countries to achieve normalcy at the borders, aided by a series of border management agreements and protocols to maintain tranquility along the border areas. However, the June 2020 Galwan clashes have changed that permanently. This paper argues that the current escalation of border clashes is both a symptom and consequence of the breakdown of the bilateral border management framework which has been dented since the 2017 Doklam standoff between both countries. Delving into diplomatic history relating to Doklam and Galwan, the findings point to the need to correct the epistemic criteria used to reproduce claims of an unambiguous boundary between India and China by both countries, in order to ensure abatement of similar outcomes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
122516
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
141502
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Gurgaon, Hachette Book Publishing India Pvt. Ltd, 2015.
|
| Description |
xiv, 328p.pbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789350099896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058350 | 327.51054/GUP 058350 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
093145
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
108375
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
100376
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
119930
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Bombay, Asia Publishing House, 1968.
|
| Description |
106p.hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 057292 | 327.51054/RAO 057292 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
115478
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Gyan Publishing House, 2009.
|
| Description |
343p.
|
| Standard Number |
8121208262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 056860 | 320.1209546/KAU 056860 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
122512
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
170798
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
144207
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article traces the development of the Sino-Indian Boundary problems from their origins during the “Great Game” period during the British Empire in India to the present day. The article looks at both the Western and Eastern Sectors, and traces the development of the various putative frontiers (the Johnson-Ardagh/ Macartney-MacDonald Lines and the McMahon Line respectively). The article looks at recent tensions which have arisen over the frontier areas, as well as the prolonged but unsuccessful attempts to solve the disputes, and considers what moves might be necessary to bring a final resolution of the problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
118124
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
100232
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
130657
|
|
|