Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:518Hits:20444019Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
SAPAROV, ARSENE (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   093716


From conflict to autonomy: the making of the South Ossetian autonomous region 1918-1922 / Saparov, Arsene   Journal Article
Saparov, Arsene Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2010.
Summary/Abstract The article investigates the reasons that led the Bolsheviks to grant autonomous status to South Ossetia in 1922. The conflict between Ossetians and Georgians during the civil war started as a social dispute but rapidly turned into an ethnic confrontation. The Ossetians turned to the Bolsheviks for support, but by 1920 they were defeated and largely expelled from their territory. After the Sovietisation of the region in 1921 the Bolsheviks needed to solve the conflict: the solution adopted was to grant autonomous status. This was not-as is often believed-the result of a divide et impera policy but an attempt at conflict resolution that in the long run satisfied neither side.
        Export Export
2
ID:   160850


Re-negotiating the boundaries of the permissible: the national(ist) revival in Soviet Armenia and Moscow’s response / Saparov, Arsene   Journal Article
Saparov, Arsene Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract In Soviet Armenia, nationalist discourse, in particular, demands for recognition of the 1915 Armenian Genocide, became prominent in public debate during the Khrushchev era. The essay uses the case study of Soviet Armenia to explore how nationalist ideas became an accepted part of the official Soviet discourse, in doing so examining the relationship between popular sentiment, the local authorities and the central authorities in Moscow. The case study suggests that the Soviet authorities implemented a much more fluid and flexible nationality policy in the periphery than is usually assumed. It also suggests that the local authorities tried to find a balance between local sentiments and the demands of the central authorities in Moscow. The research demonstrates that they positioned themselves simultaneously as guardians of the national interest and social order to their respective audiences.
Key Words Boundaries  Armenia  Genocide  Khrushchev Era  Soviet Armenia 
        Export Export
3
ID:   110446


Why autonomy? the making of Nagorno-Karabakh autonomous region 1918–1925 / Saparov, Arsene   Journal Article
Saparov, Arsene Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract Mountainous Karabakh-an Armenian-populated area within Elizavetpol' guberniya with a Turkic majority-became a source of dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan after the collapse of the Russian Empire. During the Soviet conquest of the region, the Bolshevik Party used the issue of Karabakh to promote its agenda by supporting at times the claims of its ally Azerbaijan, or those of Armenia when it needed to facilitate the capture of Zangezur. By 1921, when the Sovietisation of the region was complete, the Karabakh issue was still unresolved. The solution adopted was to leave Karabakh under Azerbaijani control on condition that it had autonomous status, but this was a solution that satisfied neither side.
        Export Export