| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
186275
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, PublicAffairs, 2022.
|
| Description |
viii, 420p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9781541701298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 060191 | 327.73051/RUD 060191 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
117967
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Debate about the future of U.S.-Chinese relations is currently being driven by a more assertive Chinese foreign and security policy over the last decade, the region's reaction to this, and Washington's response -- the "pivot," or "rebalance," to Asia. The Obama administration's renewed focus on the strategic significance of Asia has been entirely appropriate. Without such a move, there was a danger that China, with its hard-line, realist view of international relations, would conclude that an economically exhausted United States was losing its staying power in the Pacific. But now that it is clear that the United States will remain in Asia for the long haul, the time has come for both Washington and Beijing to take stock, look ahead, and reach some long-term conclusions as to what sort of world they want to see beyond the barricades.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
179878
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The US–China relationship is experiencing its worst period of tension since the normalisation of relations more than 40 years ago. The world is now entering a "decade of living dangerously", in which conflict between the two great powers is no longer unthinkable. What does this growing competition mean for the rest of Asia? This article traces the reality of the regional impact of the last four years of US–China relations under the Xi Jinping and Trump administrations before looking ahead to what the next four years of a Biden administration may bring for the Indo-Pacific. It concludes with reflections on the region's independence and agency, what can be done to strengthen regional multilateralism, and the how and why of building a genuine regional security architecture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
094543
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
147043
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In June, at a diplomatic gathering in Bangkok, the question was asked whether the OSCE was an appropriate model for security cooperation in Asia. The OSCE Asian conference, attended by Russian, Western and Asian diplomats, was a rare occasion to consider the future of Asian security architecture, drawing on European experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
179480
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Officials in Washington and Beijing don’t agree on much these days, but there is one thing on which they see eye to eye: the contest between their two countries will enter a decisive phase
in the 2020s. This will be the decade ofliving dangerously. No matter what strategies the two sides pursue or what events unfold, the tension between the United States and China will grow, and competition will intensify; it is inevitable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
154093
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
As U.S. President Donald J. Trump sets the foreign policy priorities of his administration, another international leader a few minutes from Trump Tower charts his own international and internal priorities. The new UN Secretary-General (UNSG), Antonio Guterres, began his first term in January 2017. Guterres takes over at a time of great international uncertainty, from continuing wars in the Middle East, to new frictions between the United States and China in Asia, to climate change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|