| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
127445
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
095160
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
For three decades now the country has been struggling for survival amid a never-ending armed conflict that makes a concerted foreign policy course impossible. This is fraught with a loss of statehood and is responsible for Afghanistan's role and place in the international relations system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
137329
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
THE STATES OF CENTRAL ASIA faced the Afghan problem practically right in the wake of the disintegration of the Soviet Union. It first showed in ideas of radical Islam trickling into them with the resumption of ties with Uzbek and Tajik relatives who lived in Afghanistan. Uzbekistan's President Islam Karimov managed to limit the negative impact of this process. Things, however, were totally different in Tajikistan where for the duration of civil war Afghanistan was in effect a hinterland base for the irreconcilable opposition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
115609
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Aging autocrats and an absence of clear succession mechanisms make a combination that, if not soon addressed, will lead to political upheaval. .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
129298
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
149822
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Uzbekistan is showing signs of easing the repression exercised by late president Islam Karimov. Alex Melikishvili analyses the extent to which the country will move away from its post-Soviet isolation and embrace reform, as well as improve external relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
134369
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The expulsion of US forces from the Karshi-Khanabad airbase in November 2005 and the subsequent rapprochement between Uzbekistan and Russia represents one of the most dramatic diplomatic turnabouts in Uzbek foreign policy. This article analyses the theoretical discourses surrounding the alignment behaviour of Uzbekistan. It posits that traditional alignment theories, such as balance of power and balance of threat, are inadequate in their explanations of Uzbek foreign policy due to the lack of attention paid to the nature of the regime and the internal politics of the country. It also dismisses previous attempts at characterizing Uzbekistan's alignment behaviour as ‘omnibalancing’ as inadequate and incomplete. This article argues that Uzbekistan's foreign policy is based on a multi-vectorial approach, which is designed to maximize the benefits that a particular alliance may offer Uzbekistan. A variety of sources have been consulted in the formulation of this work, from official Uzbek foreign policy statements to secondary sources, in both English and Russian.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
115429
|
|
|