Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
095247
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
150565
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Marriage is rarely accorded analytical attention by International Relations (IR) scholars. By contrast, feminist interrogators of marriage—as an institution and the site of lived experience—have exposed the reliance of militarists and militaries, and thus the conduct of international politics, on sustaining patriarchal marriage. By international political sociology taking those feminist interrogations seriously, we will be able to comprehend the significance of typically trivialized signals and gestures that otherwise fall through the nets of conventional international political analysis. “Military wives” (in all their national, racialized, and status diversity) prove worthy of serious international sociological attention. No military base, local or overseas, can be adequately understood without such attention. Attentiveness to gendered quotidian militarizing dynamics, in turn, will transform the IR narrative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
169632
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
191608
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The typewriter looked so heavy. As I stood there staring at the old machine preserved in its glass case, I wondered how much physical strength it had taken this woman to hammer the stiff keys onto the black-inked ribbon in order to record her investigatory findings on lynching.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
168496
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Taking wartime nurses – and post-war nursing – seriously makes one think more politically about the wounds endured in wartime and what counts as a wartime ‘wound’. Thinking about wounds and the wounded, in turn, reveals how war-waging officials, and militarizers more generally, have tried in the past, and today still try, to shrink citizens’ awareness of militarism’s negative consequences. Nursing, nurses, wounds, and the wounded each continues to be gendered, influencing the workings of both masculinities and femininities in past and current wartimes and post-war politics. Feminist analysts have expanded the ‘political’ and multiplied ‘political thinkers’. Failing to absorb these feminist theoretical insights fosters the trivialization of nurses and other caretakers of the wartime wounded and their diverse political thinking. It is a failing with serious implications. Overlooking nurses and others who provide wartime care, combined with a lack of curiosity about wounds, perpetuates militarization and war.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|