Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1034Hits:19075020Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
FUTURE POLICY (5) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   125574


Chile prospects: energy concerns are key election priority / Dhont, Arthur   Journal Article
Dhont, Arthur Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract Chilean voters head to the polls for a general election in November. Arthur Dhont discusses the potential for an energy crisis in the country as a result of ongoing protests, and looks at the impact the election results could have on future policy.
        Export Export
2
ID:   095743


Home economics: China moves to avert a housing credit crunch / Lee, Todd   Journal Article
Lee, Todd Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2010.
Key Words Economics  China  Credit Crunch  Future Policy 
        Export Export
3
ID:   128087


Navy seeks more money for nuclear subs / Collina, Tom Z   Journal Article
Collina, Tom Z Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract Warning that ongoing defense spending cuts will have a "devastating impact" on its plans to build new ships, the Navy is asking Congress for an additional $60 billion over 15 years to pay for a dozen new nuclear-armed submarines. Testifying Sept. 12 before the House Armed Services Seapower Subcommittee, Rear Adm. Richard Breckenridge, the Navy's director of undersea warfare, said that the Navy's projected shipbuilding budget cannot afford to pay for the 12 new submarines, known as the SSBN(X). These new boats are to replace the existing fleet of nuclear-armed Ohio-class subs, which the Navy plans to start retiring in 2027. "Congress must look at a way to provide an annual supplement to the Navy" during the time that construction costs will peak, Breckenridge said. The Navy is seeking $4 billion per year over the 15-year period that the new subs would be built, starting in 2021. Breckenridge said that the SSBN(X) should be looked at as "a requirement above the Navy" that should be insulated from "the pressures of sequestration."
        Export Export
4
ID:   127900


Post-2020 EU energy technology policy: revisiting the strategic energy technology plan / Ruester, Sophia; Schwenen, Sebastian; Finger, Matthias; Glachant, Jean-Michel   Journal Article
Glachant, Jean-Michel Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract With the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET Plan) expiring in 2020, the EU needs to revisit its energy technology policy for the post-2020 horizon and to establish a policy framework that fosters the achievement of ambitious EU commitments for decarbonization by 2050. We discuss options for a post-2020 EU energy technology policy, taking account of uncertain technology developments, uncertain carbon prices and the highly competitive global market for energy technologies. We propose a revised SET Plan that enables policy makers to be pro-active in pushing innovation in promising technologies, no matter what policy context will be realized in the future. In particular, a revised SET Plan should include a more technology-specific focus, provide the basis for planning and prioritization among decarbonization technologies, and should be based on a comprehensive approach across sectors. Selected technology targets and EU funding of innovation should be in line with the SET Plan prioritization.
        Export Export
5
ID:   130070


Professional of arms for the 21st century / Tyler, David   Journal Article
Tyler, David Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Far-reaching consequences from declining Defense budgets will take years to overcome. Given a scenario in which U.S. capabilities have waned against the march of new threats, what should be done to mitigate the risks associated with a smaller force? What parts of current military framework should be preserved or reinforced to retain our warfighting potency? Emboldened with an economic system that rewards ingenuity, Americans look to technology to solve problems. The inclination to reach first for hardware solutions certainly has merit. The tools and networks of commerce that have emerged since our founding have altered the socioeconomic landscape and fueled an insatiable appetite for material goods. But narrow-minded materialistic thinking can foreclose opportunities and even impair national security.
        Export Export