Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1279Hits:19123034Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
US DEFENCE STRATEGY (7) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   113160


America's pivot to East Asia: the naval dimension / Miere, Christian Le   Journal Article
Miere, Christian Le Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract The announcement of a reformed US defence strategy by President Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta in early January 2012 confirmed a pivot towards the Asia-Pacific as commitments to war fighting in the Middle East and Central Asia subside. Obama, Panetta and General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, briefed reporters on 5 January on America's new strategic guidance document, 'Sustaining US Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense'. The product of a review of US defence priorities 'at a moment of transition' for the nation, the document notes that the United States will 'of necessity rebalance toward the Asia-Pacific region'. The principle of the Asia pivot was also signalled by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in a November 2011 Foreign Policy article in which she noted that 'one of the most important tasks of American statecraft over the next decade will … be to lock in a substantially increased investment - diplomatic, economic, strategic, and otherwise - in the Asia-Pacific region'.
        Export Export
2
ID:   133341


Boeing details phantom swift / Jennings, Gereth   Journal Article
Jennings, Gereth Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract The US Defenec Advanced Research Project Agency (DAPRA) has commenced conceptual design reviews of the four vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) X-Plane contenders, according to a Boeing officials.
        Export Export
3
ID:   120520


Impact of the U.S. Asia-Pacific alliance on China's security / Yongsheng, Tang   Journal Article
Yongsheng, Tang Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
        Export Export
4
ID:   115277


Over-promising and under-delivering? ambitions and risks in US / Sharp, Travis   Journal Article
Sharp, Travis Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract Recent changes to US defence strategy, plans and forces have placed the United States at greater risk of over-promising and under-delivering on its global security ambitions. In 2012, the Obama administration released a new defence strategic guidance document to adapt to a shifting security environment and defence budget cuts. The guidance upholds the two long-standing American goals of global pre-eminence and global reach, but seeks to apply this military power by using new planning and regional concepts. It revises the Department of Defense's force planning construct, an important tool used to size US military forces, and identifies the Asia-Pacific and the greater Middle East as the two regions where the US military should focus its attention and resources. There are three major risks facing this revised US strategy: emerging security threats, the role of US allies and partners, and domestic constraints in the United States. Included in these risks are the proliferation of advanced military technologies, the US response to the rise of China, the continued prevalence of state instability and failure, the capability and commitment of NATO and other US allies, additional US budget cuts, political polarization in the United States, and interservice competition within the US military. In light of these risks, the United States faces a future in which it will continue to struggle to direct its military power towards its most important geopolitical priorities, such as rebalancing towards the Asia-Pacific, as opposed simply to respond to the many security surprises that are certain to arise. If the past is any guide, American political leaders will respond to the aforementioned risks in the worst way possible: by maintaining the current US defence strategy while slashing the resources to support it.
        Export Export
5
ID:   118130


Umbrella politics / Chatterjee, Debalina   Journal Article
Chatterjee, Debalina Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
        Export Export
6
ID:   096348


US defence strategy and priorities: is it changing course? / Chansoria, Monika   Journal Article
Chansoria, Monika Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2010.
        Export Export
7
ID:   129183


US funds development of new long range radar and common kill ve / Fein, Geoff   Journal Article
Fein, Geoff Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract The United States latest defence budget has spelled out a commitment to continue developing its main ballistic missile defence (BMD) interceptors .
        Export Export