Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:1110
Hits:18707364
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
SCHMIDT, ROBERT C
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
097597
Can China benefit from adopting a binding emissions target
/ Schmidt, Robert C; Marschinski, Robert
Schmidt, Robert C
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2010.
Summary/Abstract
In the run-up to the Copenhagen climate summit, the USA announced an emissions reduction target of 17% by 2020 (relative to 2005), and the EU of 20-30% (relative to 1990). For the same time horizon, China offered to reduce the CO2-intensity of its economy by 40-45% (relative to 2005), but rejects a legally binding commitment. We use the targets announced by the EU and the USA to analyze the potential gain for China if it were to adopt a binding emissions target and join an international emissions trading scheme. We show that China would likely benefit from choosing a binding target well below its projected baseline emissions for 2020.
Key Words
Energy Efficiency
;
Agent-Based Model
;
End-use Model
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
096742
Can China benefit from adopting a binding emissions target?
/ Schmidt, Robert C; Marschinski, Robert
Schmidt, Robert C
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2010.
Summary/Abstract
In the run-up to the Copenhagen climate summit, the USA announced an emissions reduction target of 17% by 2020 (relative to 2005), and the EU of 20-30% (relative to 1990). For the same time horizon, China offered to reduce the CO2-intensity of its economy by 40-45% (relative to 2005), but rejects a legally binding commitment. We use the targets announced by the EU and the USA to analyze the potential gain for China if it were to adopt a binding emissions target and join an international emissions trading scheme. We show that China would likely benefit from choosing a binding target well below its projected baseline emissions for 2020.
Key Words
Climate Policy
;
Emissions Trading
;
Abatement Costs
In Basket
Export