Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1390Hits:19129116Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
KAM, CHRISTOPHER (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   174452


Electoral System, the Party System and Accountability in Parliamentary Government / Kam, Christopher   Journal Article
Kam, Christopher Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Electoral accountability requires that voters have the ability to constrain the incumbent government’s policy-making power. We express the necessary conditions for this claim as an accountability identity in which the electoral system and the party system interact to shape the accountability of parliamentary governments. Data from 400 parliamentary elections between 1948 and 2012 show that electoral accountability is contingent on the party system’s bipolarity, for example, with parties arrayed in two distinct blocs. Proportional electoral systems achieve accountability as well as majoritarian ones when bipolarity is strong but not when it is weak. This is because bipolarity decreases the number of connected coalitions that incumbent parties can join to preserve their policy-making power. Our results underscore the limitations that party systems place on electoral reform and the benefits that bipolarity offers for clarifying voters’ choices and intensifying electoral competition.
        Export Export
2
ID:   097019


Ministerial selection and intraparty organization in the contem / Kam, Christopher; Bianco, William T; Sened, Itai; Smyth, Regina   Journal Article
Kam, Christopher Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2010.
Summary/Abstract This article promotes a characterization of intraparty politics that explains how rank- and-file party members control the delegation of power to their cabinet ministers and shadow cabinet ministers. Using the uncovered set as a solution concept and a measure of party members' collective preferences, we explore the hypothesis that backbenchers' preferences constrain the ministerial selection process in a manner that mitigates agency problems. Specifically, promotion is distributed preferentially to members whose own policy preferences are proximate to the uncovered set of all party members' preferences. Our analysis of ministerial appointments in the contemporary British Parliament supports this view. For both the Labour and Conservative parties, front bench appointments are more sensitive to the collective preferences of backbenchers in each party as measured by the party uncovered set than to the preferences of the parties' leaders.
        Export Export