Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:879Hits:19873415Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
CONFLICT OF INTEREST (4) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   105186


Conflict of interest and value: an analysis of negotiations between Taiwan and China, 1992-1998 / Li, Chien-pin   Journal Article
Li, Chien-pin Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract In the 1990s, Taiwan and China conducted over twenty rounds of negotiations through the semi-official Strait Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) concerning the following issues: notarized papers, registered mail, illegal immigration, fishing disputes, airplane hijacking, and post-1997 shipping links between Taiwan and Hong Kong. Regrouping these issues into rights, law-and-order, and shipping, this study analyzes the differences in the negotiation processes and outcomes through variations of value-interest alignments and their perceived impact on future policy objectives.
        Export Export
2
ID:   111659


Credit rating agencies and their contribution to the financial / Mullard, Maurice   Journal Article
Mullard, Maurice Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract The credit rating agencies that dominated the ratings of mortgage-backed securities were Moody's and Standard & Poor's. The two agencies rated some 4.3 trillion dollars of bonds as triple AAA, yet within a period of 18 months these same rating agencies downgraded these bonds to below investment grade. This paper seeks to show that the ratings agencies business model, the issuer pays approach, led to major conflicts of interest with both the ratings agencies unable to walk away from a rating. The evidence given by analysts to Congressional Inquiries confirms a cultural revolution within the rating agencies, with analysts feeling unable to question the quality of a rating. Analysts who were described as being awkward by issuers were removed from the rating process. In the meantime, the income for the rating agencies increased from 3 billion dollars to 6 billion dollars, with the CEOs of the rating agencies receiving incomes comparable to the incomes to the CEOs of investment banks.
        Export Export
3
ID:   188397


Effectiveness of the coastal and marine conservation initiatives in Bangladesh: analyzing the drawbacks of the legal, policy, and institutional framework / Rahman, Md Mizanur   Journal Article
Rahman, MD Mizanur Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The study attempted to identify the challenges and threats to coastal and marine conservation and assessed the effectiveness of the existing legal, policy, and institutional frameworks in this regard. This multidisciplinary research used both primary and secondary data. It was revealed that in the protected areas, both conservations and degradations go hand in hand, indicating the ineffectiveness of regulatory schemes. Ironically, many destructive activities like wetland poisoning, onslaught wildlife poaching, and clear felling of mangrove tree species threaten conservation initiatives in the coastal habitats. There is no specific law and policy which can effectively regulate marine and coastal resource management and conservation. Instead, many fragmented laws and policies created jurisdictional overlapping, followed by interest conflicts in most cases. The study recommends legal and institutional reforms to abolish jurisdictional overlapping and establish effective marine governance. The study proposed a model of an evidence-based national marine policy based on stakeholders’ perceptions.
        Export Export
4
ID:   097698


Financial disclosure in three African countries: all bark and little bite / Vickerman, Rosemary   Journal Article
Vickerman, Rosemary Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2009.
Summary/Abstract Many countries use financial disclosure to manage conflicts of interest. This article examines disclosure in three African countries: Cameroon, Ghana and South Africa. These countries fall on a continuum that sees South Africa as the relative success story, Ghana as occupying the middle position, and Cameroon as failing thus far. Disclosure regulations detailing who discloses, how often this occurs and what and when sanctions are to be taken for breaching regulations are presented in brief. Three key recommendations are made in relation to the legislation and the implementation thereof. First, it is suggested that in South Africa and Ghana the process of instituting sanctions be streamlined and, second, that those tasked with keeping the registers of financial interests are provided with the necessary investigatory powers. Finally, it is recommended that Ghana and Cameroon practise annual disclosure.
Key Words South Africa  Ghana  Cameroon  Disclosure  Conflict of Interest 
        Export Export