Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:1121
Hits:19497606
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
BURDEN - SHARING
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
098422
Bearing their share of the burden: Europe in Afghanistan
/ Siegel, Scott N
Siegel, Scott N
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2009.
Summary/Abstract
This article assesses the relative burden European members of NATO are bearing in the war in Afghanistan. Some argue that the current contribution of European forces is on par with the American contribution. However, current studies do not analyze Europe's ISAF contribution in comparison to some benchmark by which relative burden-sharing can be accurately determined. This article compares Europe's involvement in the war in Afghanistan to past missions, current contributions and in light of the benefits each country is likely to enjoy. The quantitative and qualitative findings show that there is an extensive amount of free-riding occurring both in terms of hard and soft power, although it varies across time and even within NATO Europe. Inadequate forces provided by European NATO countries jeopardize the likelihood of success in Afghanistan.
Key Words
NATO
;
Afghanistan
;
Burden - Sharing
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
113327
Each man for himself? rival theories of alliance economics in t
/ Siroky, David S
Siroky, David S
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2012.
Summary/Abstract
When military alliances are expensive, they naturally raise distributional issues. This article considers two theories to explain how much a state will voluntarily contribute to the economic burdens of defense. Empirical work has relied largely on data from the twentieth century. This article provides an out-of-sample test to evaluate the models. Using data on the Quintuple Alliance, the results are more consistent with the predictions of the joint products model than the pure public goods model. Due to credible commitment problems, and intra-alliance cleavages, I argue that we should not expect substantial free riding in most conventional military alliances.
Key Words
Alliances
;
Europe
;
Public goods
;
Burden - Sharing
;
Defense Economics
;
Free - Riding
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export