| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
144147
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Konark Publishers Pvt Ltd, 2015.
|
| Description |
xxxiv, 380p.hbk
|
| Contents |
Vol. XIII (1 January 1948 - 31 December 1948): Sardar Patel justifies partition, uniques
role in merging of over 500 princely states in Indian Union, opposes referring
of Kashmir issue to UN, elucidates Gandhiji views on armed intervention in
Kashmir and even making of an Atom bomb, if Necessary.
|
| Standard Number |
9789322008444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058596 | 954.035/CHO 058596 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
125272
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The demand for regional autonomy has been a much debated issue in the Indian democracy for a long period of time. The question of to what extent regional units should be given freedom was discussed at length during Constituent Assembly debates as well .Article 1 of the Indian constitution declares "India that is Bharat shall be union of states". Indian union was established by incorporating basic features of both unitary and federal form of governments and thus, creating a federal form of government during peace time and converting it in to unitary one at the time of crisis. The success of Indian democracy has been a matter of great debate around the world and also a matter of great curiosity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
118081
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
117153
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
134589
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, National Book Trust, 2014.
|
| Description |
xl, 351p.Pbk
|
| Contents |
Report of the States Reorganisation Commission (1955)
|
| Standard Number |
9788123771953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 057950 | 954/KUD 057950 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
099132
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
133097
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Throughout 2011, events celebrating, debating and criticizing the 50 years of Goa's existence within the Indian Union took place across Goa. These debates oscillated between the poles of perceiving what happened on the 19 December 1961 as either 'liberation' or 'occupation', reflecting the broad spectrum of perspectives at the time. Missing from these discussions were the views of Goans beyond Goa, across the Indian Ocean in East Africa and further afield. Even when divided by the Indian Ocean from life in Goa, they retained an interest in their country of origin. This paper uses archival and oral history sources to contextualize and understand East African Goans' responses, to address this gap in the literature, to problematize some existing accounts of the events and to draw attention to the significance of transimperial connections across the Indian Ocean. I argue that the lack of active involvement in political developments by the majority of Goans - whether they were in Goa or in East Africa - was intimately linked to the anxiety many of them felt about what the creation of nation-states in both the Indian subcontinent and East Africa would mean in practical terms for individuals' lives 'on the ground'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|