| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
100041
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
110000
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The author uses formal logic to establish the relationship between the military conflict and war concepts and makes the conclusion that military conflict is a generic term from which war is derived as a type. In a broad sense, war is, therefore, a variety of military conflict.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
157633
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper examines an option of establishing a logical definition of the concept military science, and also suggests a solution to the old problem of defining the object of military science. At the same time, it touches upon the issue of forming scientific terminology as exemplified by the term military art. The problems outlined in the paper, in the author's opinion, are chiefly possible to solve on the basis of formal logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
108522
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
108297
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
108525
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
161907
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper looks at two concepts fairly popular in military political analysis, to wit: strategic thinking and strategic analysis, from the viewpoint of logic. When exploring strategic thinking, attention is focused not only on the interpretation of the notions thinking and strategy, but also on the content of thinking, which is to follow the rules of logic. Strategic analysis is examined strictly as a method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|