Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:815
Hits:19975585
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
TRIBUNALS
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
100195
Impact of international tribunals and domestic trials on peace
/ Meernik, James D; Nichols, Angela; King, Kimi L
Meernik, James D
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2010.
Summary/Abstract
We analyze whether international criminal tribunals and domestic human rights trials can play an important role in peacebuilding in post-conflict societies. Advocates and scholars argue that by providing justice and truth, helping to remove war criminals and peace spoilers from their societies, and by contributing to deterrence, these institutions contribute to improvements in human rights and the maintenance of peace. Other scholars assert that few such beneficial effects have occurred. We test the impact of international tribunals and domestic trials on the recurrence of civil war and human rights improvements in states that have emerged from civil war since 1982. The evidence regarding their beneficial impacts is fairly clear, however, and suggests that while domestic human rights trials and international tribunals do not exercise any negative effects, they do not appear to contribute to reducing the recurrence of civil war or improvements in human rights practices.
Key Words
Human Rights
;
Peace
;
Trials
;
Transitional Justice
;
Tribunals
;
Civil War
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
165883
Politics of Pursuing Justice in the Aftermath of Civil Conflict
/ Kim, Nam Kyu; Hong, Mi Hwa
Kim, Nam Kyu
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
Why do some states pursue transitional justice (TJ) in the immediate aftermath of armed conflict while others do not? What drives a state to select a particular type of justice mechanism over another? Building on the political explanations of TJ, we argue that postconflict justice (PCJ) decisions are driven by the interests and power of political elites shaped by recently ended conflicts. Our empirical analysis shows that conflict outcomes and their subsequent impact on the balance of power between the government and rebel groups are the most important determinants of PCJ decisions. Domestic trials are most likely to emerge out of a decisive, one-sided victory while truth commissions and reparations are most likely to occur after a negotiated settlement. We also find that conflict severity interacts with conflict outcomes to affect PCJ decisions.
Key Words
Human Rights
;
Civil Wars
;
Internal armed Conflict
;
War Crimes
;
Tribunals
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export