Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:860Hits:19856326Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
MISSILE THREAT (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   100430


Beyond missile defence: alternative means to address Iran's ballistic missile threat / Pomper, Miles A; Harvey, Cole J   Journal Article
Pomper, Miles A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2010.
Key Words Missile Defence  Ballistic Missile  Iran  Missile Threat 
        Export Export
2
ID:   110302


Containing Iran's missile threat / Elleman, Michael   Journal Article
Elleman, Michael Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract In 2007 Washington announced that it would place long-range interceptors in Poland and an advanced missile-tracking radar in the Czech Republic as part of a larger system (known as the Third Site, after Ft Greely, Alaska and Vandenberg AFB, California) designed to protect the US mainland from the emerging Iranian ballistic missile threat. Moscow objected to the placement of missile-defence assets in Europe, claiming that their presence threatened Russia's nuclear deterrent forces. After a congressionally mandated review of US missile-defence plans, US President Barack Obama decided in September 2009 to shelve the Third Site architecture in favour of deploying proven regional systems better suited to protecting against Iran's current and near-future capabilities. US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said the decision had been driven 'almost exclusively by the change in intelligence and better technology'. Known as the European Phased Adaptive Approach (PAA), the new missile-defence strategy provided US policymakers with the capacity to deploy systems of increasing capability in phases and in accordance with the threat posed by Iran's missiles.
        Export Export