| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
100446
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
145361
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Threats to human security cannot be countered independently by one nation, therefore cooperative action and multi sectoral approach is needed. These insecurities are context specific, that is, it varies across different locations even in the same country, across nations and regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
115318
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Western security community has increasingly militarized its politics of peace, through peacekeeping, peace-making and other policies to which the 'peace' prefix has been attributed. Peace has become a virtual concept, which at times disguises rather violent management techniques of 'global governance'. Peace, within this framework, is a practice and a policy, mantled by a narrative of a liberal, and teleological, desire for non-violence. Non-violence towards the governing institutions became viewed as peace, advancing the notion of 'peace-as-order'. A teleology of liberal development helped to securitize the 'not-yet-liberalized Other', excluding non-liberal concepts from the idea of peace. Like the baby thrown out with the bathwater, peace lost its emancipatory content. A particular peace is the result, which includes transitional justice or reconciliation as rhetorical devices for its legitimization. However, the practice of 'peace' leaves these processes to the 'losers'; lasting peace between equals remains elusive and the politics of peace an exercise in managing security.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|