| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
192658
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Whilst NATO speaks increasingly publicly about the military use of cyber operations, adaptation to the cyber domain has reportedly been challenging for most militaries. Little research has sought to understand the nature of these challenges. This study seeks to address this gap through a case study of the Netherlands. By utilizing a range of primary and secondary sources, this article reveals that the Dutch Defense Cyber Command has faced significant constraints in its adaptation to the cyber domain, primarily due to issues related to organizational structure, operational mandate, and the availability of skills and resources. A cyber command that lacks regular opportunities for day-to-day operations and where personnel may not have continuous learning opportunities to acquire and refine their skills will encounter difficulties in recruiting, training, and retaining a proficient workforce. These findings highlight the tendency of observers to mistakenly equate the mere establishment of a cyber command with the existence of a robust military cyber capability – namely, the ability to effectively carry out and sustain a range of cyber operations for tactical or strategic purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
100631
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
US efforts to develop a coherent cyber-strategy have foundered because of a fundamental divide in the interpretation of the conduct of cyber-warfare. Yet both sides of this intellectual rift could be in the wrong. As such, cyberspace does not lend itself to analogies with other strategic experiences. Instead, cyber-operations should be seen as augmenting military capability in the joint campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
182707
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, MP-IDSA, 2021.
|
| Description |
105p.pbk
|
| Series |
MP-IDSA Monograph Series no.;73
|
| Standard Number |
9789382169994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 060110 | 303.4833/SAM 060110 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 060111 | 303.4833/SAM 060111 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
128829
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013-14.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Recent debate about the organizational relationship between cyber command and the NSA stress political issues over force employment. This article focuses on the latter, making the case that cyber command should be split from the NSA, because nations that marshal and molilize their cyber power and integrate it into strategy and doctrine will ensure significant national security advantage. Cyber command provides the best route for developing the tactics, technique, and procedures necessary for achieving these goals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
137762
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
130521
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
102977
|
|
|