Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
131421
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Is there any significant International Thought in antiquity beyond the West? If there is, why has there as yet been no meaningful conversation between the expanding enterprise of theorizing International Relations (IR) today and ancient Chinese political thought? This extended version of my Martin Wight Memorial Lecture addresses these questions through a critical exploration of how a pivotal idea in ancient as well as contemporary international relations, namely, the idea of order, is deliberated in ancient Chinese political thought. Inspired by Martin Wight's profound scholarship so steeped in historical and philosophical depth, it investigates why and how alternative visions of moral, social and political order are imagined, offered and debated in ancient Chinese philosophical discourse. It examines the ways in which the moral and political pursuit of order as a social ideal is conducted in the anarchical society of states in ancient China. Through these historical and philosophical investigations, this article seeks to establish that ancient Chinese political and philosophical deliberations are rich in international thought and that classical thinkers in China's Axial Age are alive to us and contemporaneous with us philosophically as much as ancient Greek philosophers are. In establishing such a claim, the article calls for, and issues an invitation to, a conversation between the world of thought in ancient China and the theorization of IR as an intellectual ritual in search of a truly international theory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
172354
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The literature on insurgency has, for the most art, skipped over the ancient world or has grossly over-simplified the discussion of events. The historians contributing papers to this volume hope to fill in that gap by discussing ancient insurgencies in the context of their own cultures. By examining how insurgencies are achieved, why they succeed or fail, what kind of response they draw from the occupying power, and what they achieve, we can come to conclusions about what contributions ancient civilizations made to what we understand about the nature of insurgencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
138906
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Iranians were aware of Sasanian history through traditional historical writings, but they knew nothing about Achaemenid history. Following European travelers to Persia from the fifteenth century, who were well prepared by reading the classical and biblical texts, Persepolis and Pasargadae were rediscovered and Achaemenid history re-established in the nineteenth century. The rise of Reza Khan to power and his grand emphasis on nationalism and ancient Iran that characterized his reign also left a deeper impact on Achaemenid studies in this period. In this paper the re-establishment of Achaemenid history and its development in nineteenth and twentieth centuries are discussed and reviewed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
128122
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
It is perhaps true that the most frequently mentioned peculiarity of the traditional Hindu Society is the institution of caste, or as it is more frequently called, the caste system. Social institutions that resemble caste in one respect or the other are not difficult to find elsewhere, but it is only in India that it is know as 'caste'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
100734
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
130799
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
"On three noble ideals be ever intent: The good thought well thought, the good word well spoken, the good deed well done." King Cyrus the Great is a towering ?gure in the history of humanity'. The reigning monarch of Superpower of the ancient world followed the footsteps of his ancestors and adopted ethical measures in his rule. Though he followed Zoroastrianism, he didn't force it on his subjects. In fact, it is acknowledged that he repatriated Jews back to Jerusalem from their exile in Babylon. He is ?rst Monarch to hold the title "The Great"? "He is known to be the first monarch in human history to grant rights to people of all nations in his empire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|