Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:804
Hits:19998604
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
TRADE CONFLICT
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
100946
Impact of trade on international mediation
/ Bohmelt, Tabias
Bohmelt, Tabias
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2010.
Summary/Abstract
If trade affects the costs of conflict, does it also influence the likelihood of mediation attempts? This article argues that dense bilateral trade between antagonists yields high opportunity costs since it is expensive to seek alternative markets and the belligerents will be highly vulnerable to sanctions from their counterpart. This creates incentives for combatants to limit hostility and settle conflicts through mediation. By contrast, the extent to which belligerents trade with other states decreases the likelihood of mediation since antagonists with alternative partners can mitigate the consequences of sanctions and substitute for markets, which may be at risk or even lost because of the outbreak of a dispute. The divergent effects of different trade ties imply that the impact of bilateral trade on the prospects for mediation should vary conditional on countries' trade with states outside the dyad and vice versa. This article demonstrates that this is partially valid.
Key Words
Sanctions
;
Trade
;
Substitution
;
Internatioal Mediation
;
Opportunity Costs
;
Trade Conflict
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
143337
Understanding the economics–politics nexus in South Korea–China relations
/ Ye, Min
Ye, Min
Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
A very interesting observation in recent South Korea–China relations is the sharp contrast between their “hot” economic and “cold” political ties. This article proposes to understand the “trade–conflict” relations from the perspective of the two states’ grand strategy of foreign policy. At the bilateral level, Vector Autoregression models are employed to test the Granger causality between Sino-South Korean bilateral trade and political relations. At the regional level, the two states’ economic and political ties with other regional powers in Northeast Asia are examined. The findings reveal different patterns in South Korea and China’s grand strategies to balance their economic and political goals.
Key Words
Trade Conflict
;
Foreign Policy
;
South Korea–China Relations
;
Trade–Conflict Debate
In Basket
Export