| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
123422
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
According to Marxist view, society is always divided into two classes such as oppressor and oppressed, rich and poor, bourgeoisie and proletariat, capitalist and the workers class. Furthermore, industralisation emerged the exploitation and degraded condition of workers by the capitalist class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
123406
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Narendra Nath Bhattacharya (1887) and in later years known as Manabendra Nath Roy (M.N. Roy) adorns a remarkable place in the history of Indian philosophy of the twentieth century. He was a versatile scholar, a linguist, a born revolutionary, a subtle theorist, a penetrating intellectual, an uncompromising rationalist and an original thinker. Unlike the other Indian political thinkers of India, Roy has made a clear distinction between philosophy and religion in his thought. Roy's intellectual odyssey took him from militant Hindu nationalism to communism and there from to emerging as a humanist and radical democrat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
025589
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
DelhI, Ajanta Publications, 19??.
|
| Description |
122p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
8120201698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 027293 | 923.254/DAS 027293 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
191064
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper investigates the thought of the Indian revolutionary and philosopher M.N. Roy (1887–1954). The essay argues that Roy’s pivot from Marxism to a liberal ‘New Humanism’ over the course of the 1930s and 1940s was shaped by his thinking about fascism and represents a broader turn away from a materialist reading of history and loss of confidence in the Indian working class. The paper begins with an analysis of Roy’s early communism, and considers his later critique, elaborated from the 1930s onwards, that ‘Gandhism’ represented an Indian form of fascism, and explores how these arguments led to his rejection of Marxism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
110388
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
040448
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Macmillan, 1972.
|
| Description |
xxxiv, xviii, 566p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
333134095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 009590 | 923.1/MED 009590 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
123414
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The darkness was just descending on the campus of the Columbia University in USA. It was in the month of March in 1917. A tall and lanky Bengali Gentleman about 6'2'' high was coming forward with his long steps ahead. If anybody looked him at a glance he could instantly understand how bright he actually was. He was then glittering with his intelligence and sharp eyes. But within moments, a handful of young and robust people from Intelligence Dept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
123418
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
123417
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
One of the most learned and most competent scholar of India as well as world was M.N.Roy. A dedicated revolutionary, philosopher, reorganizer of both society and state, a humanist etc., M.N.Roy was a unique person. He was the founder of Indian Renaissance Institute at Dehradun with chief objective to develop and organize a Renaissance Movement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
123419
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The essay aims at analyzing the political behavior of M. N. Roy and Subhas Chandra Bose in the Indian National Congress from 1936-39. M. N. Roy joined the Congress as a Marxist with a view to radicalize the Congress and bring it under a revolutionary leadership. Subhas Chandra Bose as a leader of the left nationalist force in the Congress was also dissatisfied with general Congress policy and moderate way of Gandhian approach to the anti-colonial movement. During this period both of them came close to each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
123405
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
It is customary to associate M.N. Roy with the Comintern years ( 1920-1928) and highlight his achievements as a leading Comintern functionary primarily in the capacity of a key theoretician of the colonial question. Our attention is thereby generally drawn towards his debate with Lenin in 1920 in the Second Congress and the adoption of his Supplementary Theses on the Colonial Question, apart from his speeches on India and the colonial question in the different Congresses and Plena of the Comintern.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
123410
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
M.N.Roy arrived in Mexico along with his wife Evelyn Trent in June 1917.Earlier he was detained by the police in the United States for entering the country illegally and proceedings were initiated against him by the District Police Chief of New York.Knowing that he would certainly be found guilty of trespassing as well as for conspiring to overthrow the British regime in India ( the legal term was Hindu-German Conspiracy Case) , he had no other option but to jump bail.As an Indian revolutionary he had resorted to such methods for evading arrest many times before.He and Evelyn , therefore crossed the U.S. border to Mexico.Says Roy, "Previously , I had informed myself that late in the evening a train left for the border- town of San Antonio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
123413
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Much before India achieved Independence in 1947, though not widely known, there was an attempt under the leadership of Jatin Mukherjee, M.N. Roy et al in 1915 during the First World War to attain Independence through armed insurrection in cooperation with the Germany. Although the initiative did not fructify, the efforts deserve to be recalled and given due importance in the pages of history. In fact, the incident can be considered as precursor of the later attempt by Subhash Chandra Bose in 1945 under the aegis of the Indian National Army (INA) during the Second World War with the help of Japan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
123409
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
New humanism is the philosophy of late M.N. Roy. Human individual is given central importance in it. New Humanism is a result of Roy's vast travels, experiences, reading and keen intellect. Let us see just a glimpse of his life as a necessary introduction of his New Humanism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
123415
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
I was a student of BA Hons. (History) in Ramjas College, Delhi University in the year 1962-63 when one of our teachers, Dr. Bal whose full name I am not able to recollect, in one of his classes began to eulogize M.N.Roy saying that Roy was a great revolutionary and thinker and had founded the first communist party in the world outside Russia i.e. Mexican Communist Party, played a great role in spreading communist movements in various parts of the world including India as important front-ranking member of the Communist International working with Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin. He further declared that Roy was a man of Lenin's caliber and stature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
123411
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
It should be interesting to see how M.N. Roy scanned the development of world philosophy. And also, how he came to develop the philosophy of Cosmopolitan Humanism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
101048
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
123408
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
What would have been the response of M N Roy to the disintegration of the Soviet Union and collapse of the socialist systems in Europe? Perhaps he could have said that he was long expecting that to happen. Or perhaps he could have felt sorry that a great and truly epoch making project has failed. Perhaps he would have seen in that failure a rejuvenation of the idea of Radical Humanism, which he felt, was a creative evolution of the very Marxist thought. He could have also reflected that had communism incorporated the radical humanist ideas, the tragedy would not have occurred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
116266
|
|
|