Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:365Hits:19888039Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
SERVENT, ARIADNA RIPOLL (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   101139


Point of no return: the European Parliament after Lisbon and Stockholm / Servent, Ariadna Ripoll   Journal Article
Servent, Ariadna Ripoll Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2010.
Summary/Abstract The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has raised new expectations in the area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ). The extension of co-decision increases the capacity of the European Parliament (EP) to have an influence on decision-making. This article engages with securitisation theories in order to analyse the evolution of the AFSJ as well as the role of its main actors in the securitisation process. It evaluates the past role of the EP as well as the recent changes introduced by the extension of co-decision in order to establish whether it will become a new securitising actor or will have the potential for de-securitisation of the agenda. The macro-institutional changes in the Treaty of Lisbon indicate that the EP will have opportunities to de-securitise, although the emphasis on EU citizens' rights introduced in the Stockholm programme offers it a chance to appeal to domestic audiences at the expense of more diffuse issues such as immigration and asylum.
Key Words Security  EU  Justice  European Parliament  Lisbon Treaty  Area of Freedom 
Stockholm Programme 
        Export Export