Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1672Hits:19370458Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
THOMPSON, SUE (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   132414


Greatest success of British diplomacy in east Asia in recent ye: British diplomacy and the ending of confrontation, 1965-1966 / Thompson, Sue   Journal Article
Thompson, Sue Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Arthur de la Mare, an under-secretary of state at the British Foreign Office, wrote in 1967 that the ending of the Malaysia-Indonesia Confrontation of 1963-1966 was "the greatest success of British diplomacy in East Asia in recent years." However, historians generally believe British influence in the process to end this conflict was extremely limited, as it has been widely accepted that this conflict ended through bilateral negotiations between Jakarta and Kuala Lumpur. On one level, this view is accurate, but "Confrontation" took months to end and, during this process, British, American, and Malaysian officials hoped to encourage a change in leadership in Jakarta and an eventual end to the conflict. Confrontation was an anti-colonial and a regional dispute greatly affected by the Cold War environment in Southeast Asia and, therefore, not immune from international events or actors, especially the final phase of the conflict
        Export Export
2
ID:   101832


Western powers and the development of regional cooperation in S: the international dimension, 1945-67 / Thompson, Sue   Journal Article
Thompson, Sue Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract The creation of formal regional cooperation in Southeast Asia is generally attributed to initiatives that came from countries in the region. In particular, the creation of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was a direct result of the Malaysian-Indonesian talks that ended Confrontation. Indeed, at the time many Asian leaders denied that ASEAN was the result of an outside idea or action. However, this position ignores the importance of Western financial aid in the establishment and subsequent success of ASEAN, as well as the various policy positions Western countries had taken since the end of the Second World War. This article argues that Southeast Asian regional cooperation was influenced by both Western and Asian policy and its development reflected the economic and political transformation of the Southeast Asian landscape that was taking shape at the time.
Key Words Security  Regionalism  Development  Southeast Asia 
        Export Export