| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
119327
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
129363
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In mid-April, EI Du Pont Indian announced the launch of its laboratory at Hyderabad for conducting ballistics and stab tests on Kevlar based helmets, safety vests and other items under the aegis of its material research and application centre.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
187181
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
157737
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2018.
|
| Description |
xii, 248p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789386618344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059320 | 355.03/KAN 059320 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 059321 | 355.03/KAN 059321 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
129362
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
While defexpo 2012 gave the impression of being even bigger than the last one and even more crowded, the media attention this time was totally captured by the Tatra Truck scandal and the blacklisting of IMI, Rhenmetall and Singapore technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
141276
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Confederation of Indian Industry, 2014.
|
| Description |
vii, 131p.hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058315 | 355.00954/IND 058315 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
141275
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Confederation of Indian Industry, 2012.
|
| Description |
xviii, 672p.pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058314 | 355.00954/IND 058314 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
154570
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
182630
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India has expended a great deal of energy and resources to set up a vast defence economy to innovate state-of-the-art weapon systems. However, the performance of the defence economy has been largely suboptimal. An examination of the causes of poor performance exhibits a number of shortcomings related to India’s both ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ innovation capacities. Lack of strong support from higher political leadership, meager research and development (R&D) and procurement budgets, inefficiency of the main R&D and manufacturing players, poor management of human resources and a weak acquisition system, among others, leave India’s defence innovation in a poor state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
154679
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
102186
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
112025
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
122553
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
145164
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press (IDSA), 2016.
|
| Description |
xxi, 198p.: table, figureshbk
|
| Standard Number |
9788182749054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058667 | 338.47355054/BEH 058667 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 058668 | 338.47355054/BEH 058668 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
140960
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article assesses the impact of defence offset policy on the Indian defence industry, by taking into account two key parameters—foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and exports. It observes that the offset policy has a mixed impact. On the positive side, the offset policy seems to have an impact on certain types of exports. On the negative side, the policy has not been a catalyst in bringing in foreign investment and technology inflows into the Indian defence industry, nor has it been successful in promoting its high-end manufacturing. Besides, majority of exports that the policy seems to have promoted is largely confined to parts and components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
144211
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2016.
|
| Description |
xi, 176p.: figures, tableshbk
|
| Standard Number |
9788182748927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058605 | 338.47355054/GHO 058605 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 058606 | 338.47355054/GHO 058606 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
125374
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Due to its long gestation period, infrastructure needs advance and integrated planning amongst the three services and civil agencies to ensure that the end result is cost-effective without duplication of effort and investment. Some of the measures suggested may be somewhat radical, but after over six decades since Independence, the nation expects results. A sound and secure infrastructure will enable the IAF to undertake its tasks in the most effective manner and thus become a force multiplier in the days to come.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
130077
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Clearly the aerospace needs at India, civilian as well as defence, are growing. The public sector which has so tar been tasked to meet these needs has tailed to deliver. What's more, as aerospace production becomes more complex, the public sector is likely to tail even further behind in the race. Vested interests have long fostered the myth that private sector companies are less likely to uphold the national interest than the PSUS. The private aerospace industry has been kept in a stranglehold and not allowed to realise its potential. Isn't it strange that reputed firms like Tata, Birla and M&M have been given the cold shoulder because HAL is supposedly more trustworthy when it comes to cletence matters? Yet Boeing is a reliable partner in America's detence, Airbus in Europe's and Embraer in Brazil's. The government must realise that both public and private sectors are national assets; both are necessary to achieve self-reliance in the shortest possible time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
154441
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
168142
|
|
|