| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
169808
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Imran Khan the Prime Minister of Pakistan was flying high and had developed a tinge of aggressiveness in his diplomatic offensives after Trump’s offer of ‘mediation’ on Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), where Donald Trump, the American President allegedly also quoted Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India that he too has asked for mediation. While the Trump’s statement led to a furore in India, Imran in Pakistan started preparing ground for securing international backing on Kashmir. However, he never anticipated that Modi’s Government would drop a ‘bombshell’ by rendering Articles 370 and 35A infructuous. Pakistan used this as an opportunity in connivance with China to take the issue to the United States Security Council (UNSC).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
102294
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
187507
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The communication restrictions in Indian administered Kashmir has come to an end on 5 February 2021, the ban on high-speed internet was going on since 5 August 2019 when Narendra Modi led government stripped Article 370 of the Indian constitution that provides quasi-autonomy to the region. Though Kashmiris are very much used to these kinds of blackouts but what makes it unprecedented is the duration of this longest ever communication blockade [550 days] in the history of any democracy. These challenges, coupled with intimidation, threats and movement restrictions by the state make it too difficult for the media to operate freely in the region. This paper is an attempt towards analysing the events after the abrogation of Article 370 and the impact it has on press freedom in the region. Also, an effort has been made to understand the perception of local journalists reporting from ground zero post August 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
131135
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The controversy over Article 370 has affected the psyche of the average Kashmiri and give rise to the fear that certain important right that the people of the state enjoy are going to be snatched away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
171552
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Leoni Connah suggests that Kashmir's future remains uncertain following India's revocation of its self-rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
174023
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
S.l, Authorvine, 2020.
|
| Description |
xiii, 176p.pbk
|
| Standard Number |
9788194606079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059904 | 813.54/GOE 059904 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
117908
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
For plural societies like India, the only workable strategy of nation building is to provide all segments of society with an equal sense of belonging, respect and security. The Indian constitutional framework, despite some assimilationist influences, was broadly drawn on accommodationist lines. As a matter of policy, India adopted cultural pluralism rather than an assimilationist brand of cultural nationalism. The Constitution allowed federalism to develop and evolve as a dynamic process, despite certain inbuilt limitations that undermined its functioning in its initial three decades. Nevertheless, there has never been a consensus in India about using special provisions/autonomy as a strategy of nation building or as a mechanism of problem solving. Such an arrangement in the context of Kashmir was seen as an aberration and a potential source of disunity for the country. However, the erosion of Article 370 has undermined rather than promoted the cause of national integration in relation to Kashmir.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
131137
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The BJP's long running pledged for the abrogation of Article 370, for a Ram temple in Ayodhya, and for a uniform civil code are constitutionally impossible to fulfil politically divisive and morally outrageous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
160065
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Article 370 of the Indian constitution gives the northern province of Jammu and Kashmir special status within the union. Today that provision forms a nucleus of fierce political contention between secularists and religious nationalists in India, despite the manifest whittling down of the article's most significant aspects. This development is counterintuitive: the original intent of the article's introduction had no relation to questions of religion. This essay attempts to understand this unanticipated role, as a marker of the state's secularity or lack thereof, the article has come to play in Indian politics. It contends that the seeds were sown even at the time of shaping the Indian constitution of a perspective that viewed the people of Jammu and Kashmir according to their religious affiliations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
052540
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Aldershot, Ashgate, 2001.
|
| Description |
xi, 244p.: ill.pbk
|
| Standard Number |
0754622525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 045504 | 954.6/ATA 045504 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
129948
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
170079
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Noida, HarperCollins Publishers, 2020.
|
| Description |
xiii, 293p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789353575946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059812 | 320.54/SIN 059812 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
182490
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Kashmir in the popular imagination is seen through the lens of excessively securitized and state-centric narratives that cast a shadow over the struggles of everyday life in Kashmir. An overriding climate of conflict, natural disasters, untimely snowfall and loss of tourism (one of the mainstays of Kashmir’s economy) have phenomenally shrunk people’s choices. Weak state institutions have induced a feeling of alienation among the Kashmiri people. This qualitative study attempts to look beyond the meta-narratives of conflict and brings out micro narratives of people’s lived experiences in a turmoil zone, radiating both at the inter-generational and intra-generational level, which is eclipsed in Kashmir.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
002226
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Allied Publishers Limited, 1991.
|
| Description |
xv, 723p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
8170233321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 033227 | 923.2/JAG 033227 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
169699
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In a historic move, Parliament of India has amended Article 370 and revoked 35A for complete merger of Jammu and Kashmir (J & K) with India. The bifurcation of the state is another strategic move to liberate Ladakh from political arm twisting by Valley based leadership. It will pave the way for development and empowerment of this sensitive region. It has sent message to China and Pakistan that India can no more be blackmailed on J & K in the name of collusive threat. Pakistan and separatists were confident that Article 370 and 35A are the instruments cast in iron and no political dispensation in Delhi can alter this status quo. This notion stands shredded today. It will be a miscalculation to assume that this bold move will have any impact on proxy war or terrorism. There is a possibility that instability in Kashmir may rise before it limps back to normalcy. Thus, government will have to guard and block all perils of corridors. Pakistan and separatists would try and disrupt the stability and thus, the government will have to take all precautions to deal with it firmly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|