Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:845Hits:19869087Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
EU SANCTIONS (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   151315


Either with us or against us? third-country alignment with EU sanctions against Russia/Ukraine / Hellquist, Elin   Journal Article
Hellquist, Elin Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Since the mid-1990s, selected neighbours have in impressive numbers aligned with European Union (EU) foreign policy sanctions. However, much more than for any other sanctions case, neighbours have declined joining recent measures against Russia/Ukraine. This article uses freshly gathered data from the entire period of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) to analyse how the practice of alignment influences international relations in Europe. Thereby, the article demonstrates that: (1) sanctions are not a two-party game, but an instrument that impacts broadly on relations with third countries; (2) alignment with sanctions not only articulates similarity, but contributes to normative polarization in wider Europe; (3) for a high-salience case such as Russia sanctions, neighbours are reluctant to be instrumentalized for EU foreign policy purposes.
        Export Export
2
ID:   102304


European Union sanctions and foreign policy: when and why do they work / Portela, Clara 2010  Book
Portela, Clara Book
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication London, Routledge, 2010.
Description xvi,206p.
Standard Number 9780415552165, hbk
Key Words European Union  EU  EU Sanctions  Foreign Policy 
        Export Export
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession#Call#Current LocationStatusPolicyLocation
055739341.242/POR 055739MainOn ShelfGeneral 
3
ID:   160088


Kakaя это дружба/what kind of friendship is this? Russia’s “Crimean Syndrome” / Chandler, Andrea   Journal Article
Chandler, Andrea Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea without the consent of Ukraine was a rare case of a state taking territory from a state with whom it previously enjoyed friendly relations. The paper seeks to explain the causes and consequences of this annexation by examining theories of democratic peace, constructivism and irredentism. In 1971, political scientist Myron Weiner published an article “The Macedonian Syndrome” in the journal World Politics (vol. 23, no. 4, 665–683). In particular, the paper examines the applicability of Weiner’s theses to Russia’s 2014 attempt to annex Crimea from Ukraine. While Weiner’s theory helps to explain Russia’s moves, his theory can be updated to consider the consequences of those moves. Russia attempted to justify its annexation by transposing the concept of friendship from Ukraine itself to a piece of its territory – Crimea. This transposition rested on a false dichotomy between Ukraine and Crimea, and Russia’s failure to live up to its international commitments to respect Ukrainian borders brought swift consequences in the form of Western sanctions.
Key Words Iran  Coercion  Effectiveness  Actorness  EU Sanctions 
        Export Export