| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
173980
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The study begins with descriptions of the changing political landscape of Taiwan’s domestic politics and China’s increasingly influential role in global politics to show the strategic terrain of asymmetric relations between the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan (cross-Strait relations) and some lessons of Taiwan’s 2016 elections. It attempts to delineate the 19th Party Congress report for meaningful contemplation of and conjecture about China’s purposes and policies in dealing with the prickly Taiwan issue. In essence, China’s policy under Xi Jinping after the 19th Party Congress has been characterized by a dualist approach in which a soft power charm offensive has been the primary strategy to appeal to the Taiwanese public, whereas coercive measures in the diplomatic arena and military sphere have served as the supplementary approach to pressure the Democratic Progressive Party government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
152146
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
US president Donald J Trump indicated reversal of several US policies with unwonted alacrity to reinforce “America First” and “Make America Great Again” .One of these is writing a new script for its “One China” Strategy. Probably interdependence and perceived outcomes of breaking the norm in the US-ROC-PRC triangular relationship compelled him to repair the damage but US “One China Policy” is not clearly defined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
152158
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The fact that PRC have been able to make its mark both economically and internationally have strengthened and increased the prospects of One China Principle. Most countries over the world have established diplomatic relations with China and have maintained only unofficial, cultural and trading relations with Taiwan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
152148
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The “One China Principle” proclaims that both Taiwan and mainland China are inalienable parts of a single “China”, whereof both governments claim to be the true and legitimate representatives. As both governments are striving for unification of both the territories, both uphold the One China policy, which asks that countries seeking diplomatic relations with the mainland People’s Republic of China must break off diplomatic relations with the Republic of China in Taiwan and vice versa. With the US President Donald Trump first questioning this principle and then retracting from his stated position vis-à-vis Beijing’s blunt and aggressive reaction, the consequent scenario may further push ahead the already declining American power and hegemony in the world and may also aggravate the ongoing Sino-US competitive race towards global hegemony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
102798
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The cross-Straits relationship has improved greatly since Ma Ying-jeo took over power in Taiwan in May 2008. However, people should not be over-optimistic, because all the positive changes enacted so far are not irreversible. It is important for both sides to seize this opportunity to advance the cross-Straits relationship step-by-step, and when conditions are right, to hold political negotiations and sign a peace agreement to end the status of hostility between them officially, so as to establish a framework for peace and development across the Straits, making the positive changes irreversible. The precondition for the signing of a peace agreement is a consensus on the one-China principle. Beijing has redefined the principle as 'both the Mainland and Taiwan belong to China'. It is close to Taipei's original definition of one-China, which has been defined in the ROC's 'constitution' and other official documents. Both sides should make joint efforts to create conditions for political negotiations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|