| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
186834
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
State-owned enterprises (SOEs), a key constituent of China’s economy, are an important reference for analysing China’s evolving state-market relations. Market-oriented reforms introduced in the SOE sector over the past four decades have seen the Communist Party of China (CPC) loosen its control over SOEs, shedding a large number of loss-making enterprises, and significant restructuring of remaining enterprises, including by public listing. But these achievements still fall short of making Chinese SOEs ‘modern enterprises’, and they continue to be extensions of the Chinese Party-state. Using Party documents, speeches and policy announcements, this article explores key changes and continuities in China’s state-owned sector in the post-liberalisation era. It contends that the neoliberal turn in China’s economic transition cannot be understood in the radical separation of state and market configurations but that reform and restructuring of SOEs have to be situated in a political-institutional landscape where multiple interests compete over the formulation of economic policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
162740
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
China’s port development projects at home and abroad has generated much discussion among the scholars and policymakers. Since 5 of the top 10 container ports in the world are in mainland China and its shipping companies carry more cargo than those of any other nation, it points to the port efficiency and maritime infrastructure that China has developed in the recent years. However, some of China’s port development activities abroad have been subject of controversy pertaining to its intentions around these projects. In this backdrop, the paper seeks to analyse China’s port development initiatives from littoral countries’ perspective, given their critical dependence on ports such that the level of port efficiency affects the economic growth of the region. The study takes Bangladesh’s port development projects as an example to indicate the opportunities and challenges involved in such initiatives and the need to continue with port development program in a win-win cooperative framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
116208
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
102929
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
113001
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
129688
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
For the first time since the beginning of the sixteenth centaury, the global strategic landscape and political and financial structures so far dominated by the United States and Europe is witnessing a power shift of Asia. The rise of Asia from subordinate status under Western colonialism and also during the cold war is not only a critique of Western-centrism but also describes a reconstruction of the idea of Asia Which constitute defiance of the colonial, interfering, and dominating forces that have divided Asia in the past. Various European scholars of geopolitics have called this shift the "post-Vasco da Gama era," "the coming of the post-Columbian epoch" and "the end of the Atlantic era." Similarly, the leading Singaporean intellectual, Kishore Mahbubani, has written of Asia's rise as carrying with it an "irresistible shift of global power of the east" which will transform the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|