Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:601
Hits:19944036
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
AKIRAV, OSNAT
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
177749
Agenda power of non-legislative tools
/ Akirav, Osnat
Akirav, Osnat
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
How do we assess the power of governments to control and set the agenda in parliaments? How do we assess the power of oppositions to present their agenda? Cox and McCubbins’ cartel model used a roll rate analysis of legislation, while Krehbiel suggested the use of non-legislative tools. Based on this advice, this article investigates the use of a non-legislative tool – motions for the agenda – in the Israeli Knesset, or more specifically: ‘the agenda power of non-legislative tools’ defined as the ability to block or significantly delay motions from reaching a debate in committee. Using data from the Knesset, in which the opposition operates in a parliamentary system with multiparty coalition governments, it demonstrates that opposition legislators utilise these non-legislative tools more extensively than coalition members to wield their agenda power. The findings support the addition of this tool to the cartel model.
Key Words
Israel
;
Agenda Setting
;
Knesset
;
Agenda Power
;
Non - Legislative Tools
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
103233
Use of parliamentary questions in the Israeli parliament, 1992-
/ Akirav, Osnat
Akirav, Osnat
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2011.
Summary/Abstract
This article examines the use of parliamentary questions in the Israeli parliament (Knesset) as a means of controlling the government during the years 1992-96 through an analysis of 1041 parliamentary questions on the basis of four criteria: efficiency (how long it takes to be answered); effectiveness (achieving its goals); the need for a supplementary question; and the publicity surrounding the minister's answer. It shows that although in the 13th Knesset the parliamentary question became a more efficient and effective parliamentary tool than in previous Knesset terms, its ability to serve as a means for controlling the government leaves much to be desired.
Key Words
Israel
;
Parties
;
Parliamentary System
;
Knesset
In Basket
Export