Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1572Hits:19380076Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
SCHAFFER, MARVIN BAKER (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   123729


Abundant thorium as an alternative nuclear fuel: important waste disposal and weapon proliferation advantages / Schaffer, Marvin Baker   Journal Article
Schaffer, Marvin Baker Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract It has long been known that thorium-232 is a fertile radioactive material that can produce energy in nuclear reactors for conversion to electricity. Thorium-232 is well suited to a variety of reactor types including molten fluoride salt designs, heavy water CANDU configurations, and helium-cooled TRISO-fueled systems. Among contentious commercial nuclear power issues are the questions of what to do with long-lived radioactive waste and how to minimize weapon proliferation dangers. The substitution of thorium for uranium as fuel in nuclear reactors has significant potential for minimizing both problems. Thorium is three times more abundant in nature than uranium. Whereas uranium has to be imported, there is enough thorium in the United States alone to provide adequate grid power for many centuries. A well-designed thorium reactor could produce electricity less expensively than a next-generation coal-fired plant or a current-generation uranium-fueled nuclear reactor. Importantly, thorium reactors produce substantially less long-lived radioactive waste than uranium reactors. Thorium-fueled reactors with molten salt configurations and very high temperature thorium-based TRISO-fueled reactors are both recommended for priority Generation IV funding in the 2030 time frame.
        Export Export
2
ID:   103406


Toward a viable nuclear waste disposal program / Schaffer, Marvin Baker   Journal Article
Schaffer, Marvin Baker Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract The essay deals with the lack of a suitable permanent storage site for the radioactive waste that has been produced by more than 103 open-cycle nuclear reactors in the U.S. The DOE has recently withdrawn the licensing application for the Yucca Mountain Repository leaving the nuclear industry responsible for the safety of more than 800 waste-containing concrete casks currently on the open surface at 34 sites. It also has not undertaken measures to reduce the volume of additional waste produced by both existing and newly planned reactors. The DOE has instead opted to undertake research to develop new cycles that "burn" the radioactive waste. This policy appears subordinated to obvious political pressures. It is short sighted in terms of a practical program to serve the interests of the clean and safe energy requirements of the country. The essay also describes technical initiatives and processes that are recommended for a better solution.
        Export Export