Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1521Hits:19691088Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
RETRENCHMENT (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   178501


Global Britain's strategic problem East of Suez / James, William D   Journal Article
James, William D Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Why did Britain withdraw from its military bases in the Arabian Peninsula and Southeast Asia midway through the Cold War? Existing accounts tend to focus on Britain's weak economic position, as well as the domestic political incentives of retrenchment for the ruling Labour Party. This article offers an alternative explanation: the strategic rationale for retaining a permanent presence East of Suez dissolved during the 1960s, as policymakers realised that these military bases were consuming more security than they could generate. These findings have resonance for British officials charting a return East of Suez today under the banner of ‘Global Britain’.
        Export Export
2
ID:   103652


Graceful decline: the surprising success of great power retrenchment / MacDonald, Paul K; Parent, Joseph M   Journal Article
Macdonald, Paul K Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract There is broad scholarly consensus that the relative power of the United States is declining and that this decline will have negative consequences for international politics. This pessimism is justified by the belief that great powers have few options to deal with acute relative decline. Retrenchment is seen as a hazardous policy that demoralizes allies and encourages external predation. Faced with shrinking means, great powers are thought to have few options to stave off decline short of preventive war. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, however, retrenchment is not a relatively rare and ineffective policy instrument. A comparison of eighteen cases of acute relative decline since 1870 demonstrates that great powers frequently engage in retrenchment and that retrenchment is often effective. In addition, we find that prevailing explanations overstate the importance of democracies, bureaucracies, and interest groups in inhibiting retrenchment. In fact, the rate of decline can account for both the extent and form of retrenchment, even over short periods. These arguments have important implications for power transition theories and the rise of China.
        Export Export
3
ID:   156171


Puzzle of Obama’s “small-ball” strategy: caution, retrenchment, and realism / Waalkes, Scott   Journal Article
Scott Waalkes Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
        Export Export