Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
127812
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
From a theory on occupying regimes and from traditional concepts of counterinsurgency theory, the author traces back the development of the Dutch discourse regarding present day missions. The genesis of the so-called Dutch approach is studied, and the case of Uruzgan is reviewed by scrutinizing political, security, economic, and governance aspects of the use of the military in the aforementioned province of Afghanistan. The case is studied to determine whether there really is something Dutch about this approach. We learn that the "Dutch approach" is predominantly a narrative whose main objective is the appeasement of Dutch public opinion and the legitimation of Dutch policy making. At the same time and even though more comparative case studies are necessary, it seems plausible that the Dutch approach is different. But the difference is not typical Dutch; it lies in the manner of collaborating with and co-opting indigenous elites. Studying the genesis of the "Dutch approach" is therefore an analysis of a discourse and a study in operational effectiveness at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
106320
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Are a hearts and minds approach, reliable intelligence and cultural awareness the most important ingredients for success in counter-insurgency, as present prescriptions claim? This article focuses on some of the notable non-kinetic aspects of counter-insurgency and aims to critically reflect on their role and importance. It argues that the hearts and minds ideas, the emphasis on intelligence and cultural awareness are often problematic both for their methodological foundations and empirical weight. The article closes by identifying avenues for further research.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
128629
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The author consider the potential of cultural misunderstanding to have an adverse effect on the type of operations in which we are now, and are likely to be in the future, involved. The propose that a new type of training, much of it in the matter of attitudes as well as in specific skills, should be given serious consideration.
What you can do depends on what you can do with others Paddy Ashdown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
104275
|
|
|