Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:408
Hits:19937623
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
QDR
(4)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
104537
Force planning in the 2010 QDR
/ Hicks, Kathleen H; Brannen, Samuel J
Hicks, Kathleen H
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2010.
Key Words
Military
;
QDR
;
Forece Palnning
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
104516
QDR for all seasons: the Pentagon is not preparing for the most likely conflicts
/ Godson, Roy; Shultz, Richard
Godson, Roy
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2011.
Key Words
America
;
US - Military
;
QDR
;
Pentagon Paper
In Basket
Export
3
ID:
146440
Systems of denial : strategic resistance to military innovation
/ Hill, Andrew; Gerras, Stephen
Hill, Andrew
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
Successful organizations can be extraordinarily persistent and creative in denying the obvious, ignoring signals that suggest a need to challenge key strategic assumptions. The U.S. military has been the world’s unrivaled force for twenty-five years, even lacking a peer competitor in some domains—naval operations, for example—since 1943. A danger of such sustained success is that the military might come to view these strategic assumptions not as ideas requiring continual reassessment but as enduring laws.
Key Words
Military Innovation
;
U.S. Military
;
QDR
;
Strategic Resistance
;
Systems of Denial
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
4
ID:
128723
What the QDR ought to say about landpower
/ Hoffman, Francis G
Hoffman, Francis G
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2013-14.
Summary/Abstract
The Quadrennial Defence Review (QDR) will have been completed as of this writing, but will not yet have been published. Facing new strategic priorities and mounting fiscal pressures, it is anticipated that the capacity or size of American landpower will be substantially reduced: the Army`s strength could be decremented to a post world war II low of just 420,000 to 450,000 soldiers. This article considers the implication of such reductions.
Key Words
America
;
Force
;
US Military
;
QDR
;
Landpower
;
Quadrennial Defence Review
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export