Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:1353
Hits:19135134
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
MULTI-PARTY SYSTEM
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
105386
Extreme instability in electoral system changes: the Turkish case
/ Cop, Burak
Cop, Burak
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2011.
Summary/Abstract
This article examines the extremely volatile character of electoral system changes that took place in Turkey from the end of the Second World War up until the end of the 1990s. Motives that drove these changes were either related to intentions to prevent the undesirable repetition of the past circumstances, or to political actors' short-term goals. Some of these changes seem to have reached their objectives while some others have not. The volatility in electoral institutions' design was also strongly associated with the fluctuations Turkey experienced in terms of democratic consolidation. In this respect, the Turkish case may offer a variety of useful empirical material for the prospective designers of new institutions in a number of former communist countries that are likely to experience further stages of democratic transition/consolidation in the years ahead.
Key Words
Turkey
;
Party System
;
Electoral System
;
Plurality Systems
;
Multi-Party System
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
108458
Playing the game of democracy through the electoral mechanism: the democratic party experience in Turkey
/ Sutcu, Guliz
Sutcu, Guliz
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2011.
Summary/Abstract
The commitment to the procedural rules of democracy, particularly to the electoral mechanism, on the part of political leadership is considered necessary for the establishment and survival of democracy. However, the political actors' commitment to the electoral mechanism does not guarantee the well-being of the democratic regime. In newly established democracies, the electoral mechanism itself can also function as a disadvantage to democracy if it is manipulated by the political elite. Based on this assumption, this article analyzes the case of Turkey's Democratic Party (DP, Demokrat Parti) under the leadership of Celal Bayar and Adnan Menderes between 1946 and 60 and demonstrates that political actors can exploit the electoral mechanism by either rescheduling elections or amending the electoral regulations despite their acceptance of it as one of the basic procedural rules of democracy.
Key Words
Turkey
;
Democratic Party
;
Multi-Party System
;
Electoral Mechanism
;
Iran - Democracy - 1941-1953
In Basket
Export