Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:435Hits:19934441Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
PROPHYLAXIS (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   126005


Cost effectiveness comparison of response strategies to a large: impact of timing and surge capacity / Kyriacou, Demetrios N; Dobrez, Debra; Parada, Jorge P; Steinberg, Justin M   Journal Article
Kyriacou, Demetrios N Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract Rapid public health response to a large-scale anthrax attack would reduce overall morbidity and mortality. However there is uncertainty about the optimal cost effective response strategy based on timing of intervention, public health, resources, and critical care facilities. We connected a decision analytic study to compare response strategies to a theoretical large scale anthrax attack on the Chicago metropolitan area beginning either Day 2 or Day 5 after the attack. These strategies correspond to the policy option set forth by the Anthrax Modeling Working Group for population-wide response to a large scale anthrax attack: (1) postattack antibiotic prophylaxix, (2) postattack antibiotic prophylaxis and vaccination, (3) Preattack vaccination with postattack antibiotic prophylaxis, and (4) preattack vaccination with postattack antibiotic prophylaxis and vaccination.
        Export Export
2
ID:   105416


Mass prophylaxis dispensing concerns: traffic and public access to PODs / Baccam, Prasith; Willauer, David; Krometis, Justin; Ma, Yongchang   Journal Article
Baccam, Prasith Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Key Words POD  Prophylaxis 
        Export Export
3
ID:   126125


Public response to an Anthrax attack: a multiethnic perspective / Steelfisher, Gillian K; Blendon, Robert J; Brule, Amanda S; Ben-Porath, Eran N   Journal Article
Steelfisher, Gillian K Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract The 2001 anthrax attacks emphasized the need to develop outreach that would more effectively support racial/ethnic minority populations during a bioterrorism incident. Given the importance of antibiotic prophylaxis in a future anthrax attack, it should be a priority to better support racial/ethnic minorities in mass dispensing programs. To examine the needs and perspectives of racial/ethnic minorities, this study used a nationally representative poll of 1,852 adults, including 1,240 whites, 261 African Americans, and 282 Hispanics. The poll examined public reactions to a ''worst-case scenario'' in which cases of inhalation anthrax are discovered without an identified source and the entire population of a city or town is asked to receive antibiotic prophylaxis within 48 hours. Findings suggest willingness across all racial/ethnic groups to comply with recommendations to seek prophylaxis at dispensing sites. However, findings also indicate possible barriers for racial/ethnic minorities, including greater concern about pill safety and multiple attacks as well as lesser knowledge about inhalation anthrax. Across all racial/ethnic groups, roughly half would prefer to receive antibiotics at mass dispensing sites rather than through the US Postal Service. People in racial/ethnic minority groups were more likely to say this preference stems from a desire to speak with staff or to exchange medication formulation or type. Findings suggest the need for tailored outreach to racial/ethnic minorities through, for example, emphasis on key messages and enhanced understandability in communications, increased staff for answering questions in relevant dispensing sites, and long-term trust building with racial/ethnic minority communities.
        Export Export