| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
156080
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The China factor has always been a significant structural, ideological, and organisational factor in Hong Kong elections. Since 2003, the deepening of intervention by Beijing and its Liaison Office in Hong Kong meant that the China factor as an organisational force became increasingly salient in elections. It also drove more people, especially young people, to resist China’s control and take the road of supporting independence or self-determination. The 2016 elections showed more ostensible intervention by the Liaison Office, and independence became a new campaign issue. The China factor will continue to be an integral part of Hong Kong elections in years to come.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
106257
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In the 2008 Legislative Council elections, the pro-democracy camp accomplished its basic objective of retaining more than a third of the seats. There were signs of spreading political apathy and rising resentment against the administration, evidenced by the substantial drop in voter participation, and this will increase as the economy deteriorates. The prodemocracy movement failed to contain its internal differences during the election campaign, despite recognizing that these differences would affect the pro-democracy parties' image and electoral fortunes. Indeed, the prodemocracy camp is likely to find it increasingly difficult to appeal for support from the community to exert pressure on the government, as it lacks a common, well-defined policy program. The sophistication and mobilizing powerof the pro-Beijing united front's electoral machinery were againwell demonstrated in the elections. However, this power did not effectively deliver in terms of seats won. Lack of mutual trust and the eagerness of the united front's core to exert control were likely reasons for this. These factors will not only affect future election campaign strategies, they also reflect the style of Beijing's united front policy toward Hong Kong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|