Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1156Hits:19663407Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
CONVENTIONAL MILITARY FORCES (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   106264


Failure of imagination: unmanned aerial vehicles and international security / Yeh, Stuart S   Journal Article
Yeh, Stuart S Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract This article analyzes recent advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology and draws three conclusions. First, conventional military forces are highly vulnerable to armed UAVs. A small force of UAVs could decimate entire divisions of soldiers, armor, and artillery, eliminate the ability to resupply and sustain armies in the field, destroy all aircraft in a given theater, and put Nimitz-class carriers out of action. Second, urban population centers are highly vulnerable to UAVs controlled by terrorists. Third, enormous cost savings could be achieved by replacing highly vulnerable and expensive weapon systems with UAVs.
        Export Export
2
ID:   114999


Flawed logic of a MAD man: Craig's contribution to Power Preponderance theory / Glenn, John   Journal Article
Glenn, John Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract In a recent issue of this journal Campbell Craig put forward an amended version of Power Preponderance theory seeking to explain why US unipolar predominance has turned out to be not simply a 'moment' and as such represents 'a serious anomaly for neorealist theory'. In using Waltz's own work on how nuclear weapons affect state behaviour, Craig appears to further bolster the case for Power Preponderance theory. Craig exploits what at first sight seems to be a contradiction in Waltz's work. However, Craig's error is that he treats security qua territorial security rather than considering a more encompassing view of state security. In the arena of 'secondary' security issues the usual logic of counter-balancing with conventional military forces still holds sway. This reply argues that a balance of power will return to the international system, it is just that at this moment no country or coalition of countries is quite up to the task.
        Export Export