| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
159709
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Adroit Publishers, 2017.
|
| Description |
xxiv, 340p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9788187393375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059423 | 382.51054/SIN 059423 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
129685
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
BCIM (Bangladesh, China, India and Myanmar) forum for regional cooperation was jointly initiated by think tanks of China and India at the end of 1990s. on August of 1999, the first conference was held in Kunming and announced Kunming initiative, which opening the exploration of BCIM forums were convened persistently and alternately from 1999-2013 among four countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
106494
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
140304
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Many sub-regional initiatives are prospering in Asia. As the limits to regional cooperation become evident, particularly in the SAARC context, sub-regional cooperation offers a window of opportunity for India to push through economic integration of India with its South and South East Asian neighbours. Already some examples exist which need to be emulated and expanded upon such as ADB‘s SASEC programme for some South Asian countries or BIMSTEC involving South and South East Asia. This paper spells out the need and rationale for energising sub-regional cooperation among three major countries straddling the South and South East Asia axis namely India, Bangladesh and Myanmar. It argues that there is sufficient content and context in the three bilateral relationships, which of late have been witnessing upswings, to start working on various trilateral cooperation proposals. This will not only be a win-win formula for all three countries involved but will also propel greater cooperation in some other larger configurations of sub-regional cooperation namely BIMSTEC or BCIM-EC as these three countries form the geographical kernel of other frameworks as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
140128
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Development of peripheries has always been a major challenge for large states. One of the drivers of the underdevelopment of the peripheries has been the traditional state-centric security perception. As a result, state-led development suffers from a built-in bias against the peripheries. Market signals emanating from the operation of the national economy are not strong enough to bring the resources of the peripheries into immediate use. This is the theoretical rationale to look beyond the framework of the national economy and the state-centric mindset while formulating the development strategy for border areas. Sub-regional cooperation like Bangladesh–China–India–Myanmar Forum for Regional Cooperation (BCIM) has the potential to promote growth in southwest China, Bangladesh, Myanmar and northeast India by way of utilising the complementarities of these regions. The mobilisation of cross-border synergies is destined to make the BCIM one of the economically vibrant zones that may develop the cross-border connectivity among the land-linked areas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|