Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:594Hits:20070377Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
US PRIMACY (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   160008


Explaining Australia–Japan security cooperation and its prospects: the interests that bind?’ / Heazle, Michael   Journal Article
Heazle, Michael Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract In this paper, we assess the drivers of, and prospects for, further security cooperation in the Australia–Japan bilateral relationship. We argue that while balance of threat and capability gaps may restrain the pace of deepening Australian-Japan security relations, these gaps are diminishing and are, in any case, secondary to the specific shared interests we posit as the primary drivers of Australia–Japan security cooperation. These specific interests, however, are shaped not only by a commitment in both countries to liberal-based principles and freedoms at home and in inter-state relations, but also by a common awareness of the importance of continued US primacy to the ongoing maintenance of those interests. Thus, in the absence of any fundamental change in how Australia and Japan understand their respective interests and the US role in the region, Donald Trump's recent and unexpected election as US president notwithstanding, we conclude that the case for further security cooperation – via additional cross-bracing of their respective US alliance relationships – will almost certainly remain compelling for both countries.
        Export Export
2
ID:   106956


False promise of unipolarity: constraints on the exercise of American power / Kupchan, Charles   Journal Article
Kupchan, Charles Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract In World out of balance, Stephen Brooks and William Wohlforth make a valuable contribution to ongoing debate about the systemic effects of unipolarity and the durability of US primacy. They are correct that unipolarity engenders systemic stability because the power gap between the United States and potential rivals forestalls military balancing. However, Brooks and Wohlforth underweight other means through which major states are resisting US power and they fail to appreciate that the systemic characteristics of unipolarity may change in relatively short order.
        Export Export