| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
147855
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, IDSA, 2016.
|
| Description |
108p.pbk
|
| Series |
IDSA Monograph Series no; 52
|
| Standard Number |
9789382169642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058826 | 330.55054/RAJ 058826 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 058827 | 330.55054/RAJ 058827 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
151974
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
With its enormous natural and human resources, a growing economy and adjacency to Iran’s security and strategic environment, India is considered one of the most important options with which the Islamic Republic of Iran can establish stable and reliable, if not strategic, relations. Despite this, all economic, trade and cultural capacities as well as diplomatic initiatives have not elevated the mutual relations higher than ‘cordial and friendly’. The present article discusses the reasons behind Indo-Iranian failure to create a once desired strategic partnership. The main idea is that differences in the direction and objectives of the relations between Iran and India, that is, balancing the United States for the former and cooperation with Iran besides the United States for the latter, have led to failure of the efforts to establish a strategic partnership. The theory of soft-balancing is used to analyse Iran–India relations when United States as a factor affecting bilateral relations is concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
121064
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Some US experts now believe that the Iran sanctions have become such an inter-locking maze that it would be difficult to single them out and lift them, if the US and allies seek to incentivise Iranian moves in addressing the nuclear concerns. India, on the other hand, could do well to take away a bit of the sting of these sanctions by taking prudent positions in the United Nations and the other multi-lateral negotiations to the extent its words count. Tehran under Rouhani would have to show the world that its asymmetric military capabilities are only there to cause retribution to deter those who have violence in their minds about the nation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
108409
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Economic sanctions have often been considered an important tool for disciplining adversaries and compelling them to offer important concessions. History, however, suggests otherwise. Economic penalties rarely cause states to abandon important national assets. After decades of struggling under punitive financial measures, Iran has persisted with its objectionable policies ranging from terrorism to proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. All this suggests that ideological regimes that put a premium on their political priorities and which are seemingly insensitive to the mounting costs of their belligerence may not be suitable candidates for the type of cost-benefit analysis that sanctions diplomacy invites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
150332
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Iran denounced U.S. congressional action to extend sanctions against the country as a violation of the nuclear deal it negotiated with the United States and its partners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|