Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
138358
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
108752
|
|
|
Publication |
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
|
Description |
xxviii, 228p.
|
Standard Number |
9780521821391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
056391 | 955.05/ABR 056391 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
044147
|
Iran
/ Armajani, Yahya
|
1972
|
|
|
Publication |
New Jersey, Prentice Hall Inc., 1972.
|
Description |
viii, 182p.hbk
|
Series |
Modern Nations in Historical Perspective
|
Standard Number |
0135061393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
011443 | 955/ARM 011443 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
040749
|
|
|
Publication |
California, Hoover Institution Press, 1978.
|
Description |
xxii, 550p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
0817966412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
018206 | 955.05/LEN 018206 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
160287
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The Peace Corps brought an estimated 1,800 Americans to Iran from 1962 to 1976, coinciding with the unfolding of Mohammad-Reza Shah Pahlavi’s Enqelāb-e Sefid, or White Revolution. This article surveys Peace Corps Iran’s fourteen-year history by dividing it into three distinct moments defined by changing social and political conditions in Iran and shifting US‒Iranian relations. Initially, the Peace Corps Iran experiment built on earlier American foreign assistance programs, while coinciding with the roll-out of the White Revolution. Second, during its heyday in the mid-1960s, the Peace Corps inevitably became entangled with the White Revolution’s unfolding, both experiencing a phase of expansion and apparent success. Finally, as Iranian social and political conditions moved toward instability by the 1970s, Peace Corps Iran also seemed to have lost its direction and purpose, which ultimately led to a vote by volunteers to terminate the program. Based on accounts by US Peace Corps volunteers and the Iranians with whom they worked, the Peace Corps Agency, and the US State Department, this article argues that, ultimately, the Peace Corps Iran experience left a more lasting legacy on individuals than institutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
040153
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House, 1980.
|
Description |
240p.: ill.Hbk
|
Standard Number |
0706912942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
019063 | 920.9320/PAH 019063 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
186154
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article seeks to explore the reaction and attitude of the Tudeh Party of Iran to the land reform initiatives enacted by the Pahlavi state between 1958 and 1964. This article will in particular describe how the party analysed the various stages of the land reform programme through both its lively media operation and internal party documents. Based on a close reading of this material, this article will also focus on how the exiled party’s attitude with regards to the Pahlavi state and other contemporary political actors affected its opinion of the rise to prominence of Ayatollah Ruhallah Khomeini in the midst of the land reform programme. The article will hence conclude by offering a new account of the Tudeh’s initial attitude to Khomeini’s initiatives from the 15 Khurdad uprising to the cleric’s exile and gauge the extent to which the same was informed by the previous analysis of the land reform initiatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
183882
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article examines the cinematic representation of hegemonic currents in the films produced in Iran during the 1960s and 1970s. In a close reading of the mainstream, artistic and political films of the period it probes the effects of the newly established capitalist mode of production in the cinematic production. Drawing on Gramsci’s theory of hegemony, it demonstrates how a new social class appeared in the country as a result of the so-called White Revolution and land reform and discusses the changing alliances of this class during the 1960s and the 1970s which contributed to the formations of hegemonic force-fields. Accordingly, this articles traces the transformation of the hegemonic processes of incorporation in the realm of cinema from the duality of residual/emergent significations through alternative practices (considering Raymond Williams’s terminology) in the 1960s to pre-emergent and later radically emergent and oppositional practices in the 1970s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|