Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1513Hits:19148296Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
BLAME (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   108996


Blame narratives and religious reason in the aftermath of the 2 / Simpson, Edward   Journal Article
Simpson, Edward Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract Recent writing on religion in Gujarat has often confused political rhetoric with common religious belief and practice. Thus, religious categories have become caricatures standing for sociological realities and totalised worldviews. In this scheme, 'Hindus' and 'Muslims' are supposed to believe different things which ensure that they see and act in the world quite differently. In this paper, I examine the narratives of blame that emerged after the 2001 earthquake in Gujarat. The ethnography suggests that although religious identity plays a role in the way blame is cast, people of different religious communities also use common frames of logic and their shared experiences of shock and alienation to explain catastrophe. The religious reasoning of blame narratives is therefore shown to have a broader cultural existence outside the boundaries of particular religious identities.
Key Words Religion  Gujarat  Muslims  Natural Disaster  Earthquake  Hindus 
Blame 
        Export Export
2
ID:   190059


Discourses of blame in strategic narratives: the case of Russia’s 5G stories / Hansson, Sten; Madisson, Mari-Liis; Ventsel, Andreas   Journal Article
Hansson, Sten Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Governments spread strategic narratives via media to influence foreign audiences and policy makers. A frequent but understudied feature of strategic narratives is the discursive construction of blame. In this article, we use the coverage of the adoption of 5G cellular technology in Russian state-funded news portals as an example to show how to interpret blame narratives about international security issues. We combine methods and insights from the discourse-analytic studies of blame and the research into the uses of strategic narratives in international relations to reveal how various articulations of blame are used to (de)legitimise particular actors and actions, sow discord, and foster alliances. Our analysis sheds new light on blame discourses that are more sophisticated and indirect than straightforward accusations and may serve multiple strategic goals at once. It also contributes to scholarship on Russia’s strategic communication about China as well as the United States and its allies.
Key Words United States  China  Russia  Strategic Narrative  Blame  5G 
        Export Export