| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
134400
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2015.
|
| Description |
xii, 212p.Hbk
|
| Contents |
In association with Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses
|
| Standard Number |
9788182747746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 057904 | 954.88/KAU 057904 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 057905 | 954.88/KAU 057905 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
121080
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The ARA Libertad Case (Argentina v. Ghana) is the first instance where the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), Hamburg, Germany considered the issue of the release of a warship which was detained in a foreign port contrary to the principles of sovereign immunity of warships. The Argentinian warship was detained based on a commercial case filed by an American hedge fund against Argentina in the Ghanaian Court. According to the Court, Argentina had waived sovereign immunity in respect of the claims of the bondholders and, therefore, the warship could be arrested for execution of a monetary claim. This article examines the ITLOS order at the backdrop of warship rights and duties under the International Law of the Sea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
109205
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This part supplemented materials reflecting Chinese practice in 2010 relating to: I. International Law of the Sea (Responsibility and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the International Seabed Area; Arctic Cooperation); II. International Law on Outer Space (Peaceful Use of Outer Space); III. International Criminal Law (Crime of Aggression); IV. International Environmental Law (Climate Change).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
122805
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This Survey covers materials reflecting Chinese practice in 2011 relating to: I. Fundamental principles of international law (principles of non-use of force; principle of peaceful settlement of international disputes; principle of non-intervention of internal affairs; rule of law at the national and international levels); II. International law of treaties (reservations to treaties; effects of armed conflicts on treaties); III. Recognition of new states and governments (Republic of South Sudan; Libyan National Transitional Council); IV. State immunity; V. China's territorial integrity (Taiwan; Tibet; China-India border issue; Diaoyu Island and its affiliated islands; Nansha Islands); VI. Polar regions (Antarctic; Arctic); VII. International law of the sea (general position; Chunxiao oil and gas field in East China Sea; South China Sea; China-Vietnam Agreement on Basic Principles Guiding Settlement of Sea Issues; marine environment; marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction; sustainable fisheries; Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf; International Seabed Authority; International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea; Somalia piracy); VIII. International law on outer space; IX. International human rights law (General position; rights of the child; Human Rights Council; Implementation of human rights instruments); X. International humanitarian law (protection of civilians in armed conflicts); XI. International law on disasters (protection of persons in the event of disasters); XII. International law on arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation (general position; Protocol to the Southeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty; abandoned Japanese chemical weapons in China; landmines); XIII. International criminal law (International Criminal Court; the Bashir case; Mr. LIU Daqun elected as judge of international residual mechanism for criminal tribunals; UN Special Tribunal for Lebanon; scope and application of universal jurisdiction; immunity of state officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction; measures to eliminate international terrorism; decision on issues concerning strengthening anti-terrorism work; ratification of China-Russia Agreement on Cooperation in Fighting against Terrorism, Separatism and Extremism; UN investigation of war crimes in Sri Lanka; law enforcement cooperation along the Mekong River among China, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand; Bilateral Treaty on Extradition and Treaty on Assistance in Criminal Matters with Italy; transfer of a British suspect of pornographic crimes to the United Kingdom; transnational organized crime; international drug control; international code of conduct for information security); XIV. International environmental law (climate change; joint statement on EU's inclusion of aviation into EU emission trading scheme between China and Russia; effects of atomic radiation; use of water resources of cross-border rivers); XV. International law on international organizations (responsibility of international organizations; role of UN and its reforms; UN financing; UN peacekeeping operations; Mr. HUANG Huikang elected as member of the International Law Commission; establishment of Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat; ratification of the Third Protocol Amending the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia); XVI. International law on settlement of disputes (International Court of Justice (ICJ); Ms XUE Hanqin elected as member of the ICJ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
188224
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In August 2021, Pacific Islands Forum Leaders issued the Declaration on Preserving Maritime Zones in the Face of Climate Change-Related Sea-Level Rise (PIF Declaration), declaring their intention that their maritime zones, and rights and entitlements flowing from those zones, would be maintained notwithstanding the effects of sea-level rise. This article offers a commentary on the PIF Declaration in the context of scholarly debate on sea-level rise implications for baselines and maritime zones, and in light of its historical lineage. The PIF Declaration’s significance lies in giving prominence to a package of state practice, comprising the establishment of maritime zones using fixed methods, their notification to the international community, and their maintenance over time. The article examines evidence of such practice among PIF members, and considers how such practice advances the PIF Declaration’s claim that the preservation of maritime zones may be achieved through the interpretation and application of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
143457
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Hamburg, Office of the Publication Section, 1974.
|
| Description |
382p.pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 016145 | 341.44/UNI 016145 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|